Skip to content

health

Blood Glucose Level Support

Blood Glucose Level Support refers to changes in laboratory markers related to blood-sugar regulation, including fasting glucose, HbA1c, and fasting insulin. It is a biomarker-based outcome, so changes may differ between markers rather than moving uniformly in the same direction.

A concise look at Blood Glucose Level Support, presented as a health-related effect.

These are research findings, not promises. Most options have little evidence, and results differ from person to person.

What may help

What studies found for each option, best evidence first.

37 options:1 good evidence4 some evidence5 mixed19 not enough evidence2 not tested in people6 no benefit found

  • Hatha YogapracticeGood evidence it helpsSize of effect: Not known

    Good human studies found a benefit, and they mostly agree. This is about what studies measured, not a cure.

    6 of 7 studies found a benefit; 1 found none. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials found fasting blood glucose was 12.25 mg/dL lower, on average, among 1,387 people in its fasting-glucose analysis. Results varied substantially across the trials; one trial also reported a 29.48% decrease in the Hatha yoga group.

    Open the Hatha Yoga page
  • Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)practiceSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Not known

    Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.

    All 2 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    In people with Diabetes Type 2, pooled randomized trials reported reductions in HbA1c (−1.18%), FPG (22.43 mg/dL) and OGT (−36.6 mg/dL) compared with standard care. Another pooled analysis involving 319 people with Diabetes Type 2 reported improvements in FPG alongside periodontal indices and hs-CRP.

    Open the Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation) page
  • CyclingpracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Not known

    Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.

    All 3 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    Open the Cycling page
  • Laughter Yoga / TherapypracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Not known

    Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.

    All 3 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.

    In a 2023 randomized trial of 42 people with type 2 diabetes, mean HbA1c changed from 7.07% to 6.82% with Laughter Yoga, compared with 7.19% to 7.26% in the control group; the between-group difference was −0.31% (95% confidence interval: −0.54% to −0.09%). A 2026 quasi-experimental study also reported a reduction in fasting blood sugar.

    Open the Laughter Yoga / Therapy page
  • BreathworkpracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Not known

    Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.

    All 2 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.

    A 2026 randomized trial of 62 people found fasting glucose was reduced by -6% compared with usual care. A review also reported a significant decrease in fasting blood sugar in one trial.

    Open the Breathwork page
  • QigongpracticeMixed resultsSize of effect: Large

    Studies disagree: some found a benefit, others found none. Do not count on it.

    4 of 6 studies found a benefit; 2 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    A 2017 meta-analysis of randomized trials found fasting blood glucose was 8.88 mg/dL lower with Tai Chi/Qigong than with no intervention or usual care among 85 people in its analysis. A 2023 analysis found lower fasting blood glucose with a 3-month intervention than a 6-month Qigong intervention, but concluded that the evidence was insufficient to establish this difference.

    Open the Qigong page
  • FastingpracticeMixed resultsSize of effect: Very small

    Studies disagree: some found a benefit, others found none. Do not count on it.

    30 of 43 studies found a benefit; 13 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    Open the Fasting page
  • Strength TrainingpracticeMixed resultsSize of effect: Medium

    Studies disagree: some found a benefit, others found none. Do not count on it.

    11 of 16 studies found a benefit; 5 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials found hemoglobin A1c decreased by -0.62% among 1,396 people in its outcome analysis; another found fasting blood glucose improved compared with standard treatment. Findings vary by comparison: a separate pooled analysis found no significant differences between LP and UP in glycemic parameters.

    Open the Strength Training page

Comparing practices

  • Hatha YogaGood evidence it helps5 trials
  • QigongMixed resultsSize of effect: Large4 trials
  • YogaMixed resultsSize of effect: Large11 trials

The expert view shows every study, dose protocol and source.

What may help

Linked to improving it37 listed

Start here

Highest probability, strongest evidence

  1. PracticesHatha YogaCertaintyHighSourceRCT7 other sources

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials found fasting blood glucose was 12.25 mg/dL lower, on average, among 1,387 people in its fasting-glucose analysis. Results varied substantially across the trials; one trial also reported a 29.48% decrease in the Hatha yoga group.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Coronary Artery Disease
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Heart Disease
    • Hypertension
    • Metabolic Syndrome
    • Perimenopause
    • +1 more

    Study result

    For FBG, the pooled WMD was −12.25 mg/dL (95% CI: −21.30 to −3.19), with I² = 94% indicating substantial heterogeneity (P < 0.00001).

    Open Hatha Yoga
    →
Medium probability(9)
  1. PracticesFastingCertaintyMediumSourceMeta-analysisTrivial effectconflicting findings44 other sources

    Pooled analyses whose designs were not recorded found a fasting-glucose change of MD: -2.98; 95% CI: -4.7, -1.26, while a meta-analysis of randomized trials found a change of WMD: -0.14 mmol/l in 2,032 people. Results are not consistent across comparisons: another pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded found no significant difference between intermittent fasting and continuous energy restriction (MD = 0.03 mmol/L; 95% CI, −0.15 to 0.21; p=0.727).

    How big is the effect

    Trivial effectReal in studies, but too small for most people to notice.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Breast Cancer
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Fatty Liver Nafld
    • Hypercholesterolemia
    • Hypertension
    • Metabolic Syndrome
    • +4 more

    Study result

    TRE showed benefits on fasting glucose (MD: -2.98; 95% CI: -4.7, -1.26) (low-certainty evidence)

    Open Fasting
    →
  2. PracticesStrength TrainingCertaintyMediumSourceMeta-analysisModerate effectconflicting findings16 other sources

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials found hemoglobin A1c decreased by -0.62% among 1,396 people in its outcome analysis; another found fasting blood glucose improved compared with standard treatment. Findings vary by comparison: a separate pooled analysis found no significant differences between LP and UP in glycemic parameters.

    How big is the effect

    Moderate effectA clear difference on average.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Menopause
    • Metabolic Syndrome
    • Obesity
    • Overweight
    • Pregnancy
    • +1 more

    Study result

    Resistance training also improved glycemic control, reducing hemoglobin A1c by -0.62%

    Open Strength Training
    →
  3. PracticesQigongCertaintyMediumSourceRCTLarge effect6 other sources

    A 2017 meta-analysis of randomized trials found fasting blood glucose was 8.88 mg/dL lower with Tai Chi/Qigong than with no intervention or usual care among 85 people in its analysis. A 2023 analysis found lower fasting blood glucose with a 3-month intervention than a 6-month Qigong intervention, but concluded that the evidence was insufficient to establish this difference.

    How big is the effect

    Large effectA big difference on average. Check how strong the evidence is.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Anxiety Disorder
    • Breast Cancer
    • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Fibromyalgia
    • +5 more

    Study result

    significant benefits of Tai Chi/qigong over no intervention/usual care (for diabetes) control intervention for fasting blood glucose (n=2 studies with 85 participants; mean group difference: −8.88 mg/dL (95% CI: –16.73, −1.03), I²=0%)

    Open Qigong
    →
  4. PracticesRed Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)CertaintyMediumSourceRCT3 other sources

    In people with Diabetes Type 2, pooled randomized trials reported reductions in HbA1c (−1.18%), FPG (22.43 mg/dL) and OGT (−36.6 mg/dL) compared with standard care. Another pooled analysis involving 319 people with Diabetes Type 2 reported improvements in FPG alongside periodontal indices and hs-CRP.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Diabetes Type2

    Study result

    Significant between-group reductions were observed in HbA1c (−1.18%), FPG (22.43 mg/dL), and OGT (−36.6 mg/dL) compared with standard care (all p < 0.0001)

    Open Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)
    →
  5. PracticesYogaCertaintyMediumSourceRCTLarge effectconflicting findings14 other sources

    A 2026 pooled analysis of randomized trials reported that yoga reduced HbA1c by 0.64%; another 2026 pooled analysis found no benefit for fasting blood glucose, so the findings differ by glucose measure.

    How big is the effect

    Large effectA big difference on average. Check how strong the evidence is.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Anxiety Disorder
    • Arthritis
    • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
    • Chronic Pain
    • Coronary Artery Disease
    • Depression
    • +8 more

    Study result

    Yoga reduced HbA1c by 0.64% (95% credible interval [CrI] −0.87 to −0.41)

    Open Yoga
    →
  6. PracticesPilatesCertaintyMediumSourceRCTconflicting findings7 other sources

    A 2025 pooled analysis of randomized trials found HbA1c was lower by 0.96% compared with standard care among 275 people. Findings differ across reviews: one review noted Pilates was not the most effective intervention for glycaemia control.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Metabolic Syndrome
    • Obesity
    • Overweight
    • Pregnancy

    Study result

    PG presented with a significantly lower post-prandial blood glucose than the CG (MD = −22.25 mg/dL, 95% CI: [−28.34, 16.17] mg/dL, P < 0.00001, I^2 = 0%)

    Open Pilates
    →
  7. PracticesCyclingCertaintyMediumSourceClinical3 other sources

    A pooled analysis whose study designs were not recorded found 2-h post plasma glucose decreased from 5.53 ± 1.18 to 5.03 ± 0.91 mmol L−1 (p < 0.05) among 20 people in its outcome analysis. A systematic review also reported lower glycosylated hemoglobin in all five HIIT interventions compared with control groups.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients

    Study result

    Peterman et al. reported a decrease (p < 0.05) in 2-h post plasma glucoses from 5.53 ± 1.18 to 5.03 ± 0.91 mmol L−1

    Open Cycling
    →
  8. PracticesLaughter Yoga / TherapyCertaintyMediumSourceClinical3 other sources

    In a 2023 randomized trial of 42 people with type 2 diabetes, mean HbA1c changed from 7.07% to 6.82% with Laughter Yoga, compared with 7.19% to 7.26% in the control group; the between-group difference was −0.31% (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.54% to −0.09%). A 2026 quasi-experimental study also reported a reduction in fasting blood sugar.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Diabetes Type2

    Study result

    The mean HbA1c levels changed from 7.07% to 6.82% in the laughter yoga group and from 7.19% to 7.26% in the control group. The unadjusted difference between the two groups was statistically significant (−0.31%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.54% to −0.09%; P = 0.008).

    Open Laughter Yoga / Therapy
    →
  9. PracticesBreathworkCertaintyMediumSourceClinical2 other sources

    A 2026 randomized trial of 62 people found fasting glucose was reduced by -6% compared with usual care. A review also reported a significant decrease in fasting blood sugar in one trial.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition

    Study result

    One RCT reported significant decrease in FBS

    Open Breathwork
    →
Low probability(19)
  1. PracticesAnusara YogaCertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysis2 other sources

    A 2026 meta-analysis of randomized trials in people with Obesity found a decrease in HbA1c (mean difference -0.04%, 95% CI: -0.07% to -0.02%, I² = 54%); the estimated change was trivial.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Obesity

    Study result

    yoga practices showed benefits on HbA1c (mean difference -0.04%, 95% CI: -0.07% to -0.02%, I² = 54%)

    Open Anusara Yoga
    →
  2. PracticesCardioCertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisModerate effectconflicting findings13 other sources

    Pooled analyses found improved glucose measures in postmenopausal women and lower glycated hemoglobin compared with standard treatment (SMD -0.79 %, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.41). In contrast, a pooled analysis of randomized trials found no significant change in fasting glycaemia, so findings differed across measures and analyses.

    How big is the effect

    Moderate effectA clear difference on average.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Obesity
    • Overweight
    • Pcos

    Study result

    Compared to the CON, AE (MD = −3.66, 95% CI: −6.32, −1.03) ... showed a greater advantage in improving Glu in postmenopausal women

    Open Cardio
    →
  3. PracticesHigh-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)CertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisSmall effectconflicting findings43 other sources

    Pooled analyses of randomized trials found lower blood glucose, including a reduction in fasting glucose of 16.63 mg/dL with low-volume HIIT versus control in an analysis of 738 people. Findings disagree: another pooled analysis reported no significant effect on glucose.

    How big is the effect

    Small effectA small but noticeable difference on average.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Cancer
    • Coronary Artery Disease
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Type1
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Fatty Liver Nafld
    • +12 more

    Study result

    BG (SMD = −0.37, 95% CI: −0.69 to −0.06; p < 0.05)

    Open High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)
    →
  4. PracticesTai ChiCertaintyLowSourceRCTTrivial effect4 other sources

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials found lower 2-hour post-load glucose with Taiji compared with its comparator (MD: –0.95; 95%CI: [–1.87, –0.04]) in 2026. Another pooled analysis whose study designs were not recorded reported a fasting blood glucose difference of −0.41 mmol/L (95% CI: −0.76 to −0.05).

    How big is the effect

    Trivial effectReal in studies, but too small for most people to notice.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Breast Cancer
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Obesity
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Prediabetes
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Study result

    Taiji (MD: –0.95; 95%CI: [–1.87, –0.04]) showed a significant reduction in 2hPG compared to LI; massage had the highest SUCRA (94.1%) and Taiji ranked third (SUCRA 54.1%).

    Open Tai Chi
    →
  5. PracticesAcceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)CertaintyLowSourceRCT2 other sources

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials involving 712 people with Diabetes Type 2 reported improved glycemic control (MD -0.95 %).

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Diabetes Type2

    Study result

    ACT demonstrated significant improvements on patients' glycemic control (mean difference [MD]: 0.95%; p [truncated in source])

    Open Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
    →
  6. PracticesAcupunctureCertaintyLowSourceRCT1 other source

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials found that body acupuncture + CT had the best effect on fasting blood glucose (FBG) in people with type 2 diabetes (MD = -0.84, 95% CI: -1.01, -0.67; SUCRA = 84.44%).

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Diabetes Type2

    Study result

    body acupuncture + CT had the best effect on improving fasting blood glucose (FBG) (MD = -0.84, 95% CI: -1.01, -0.67; SUCRA = 84.44%)

    Open Acupuncture
    →
  7. PracticesMeditationCertaintyLowSourceRCTModerate effect1 other source

    Overall, mindfulness-based interventions showed improvement of HbA1c (Hedges' g = 0.564, 95%CI 0.221, 0.908, p = 0.001)

    How big is the effect

    Moderate effectA clear difference on average.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Diabetes
    Open Meditation
    →
  8. PracticesJump Rope TrainingCertaintyLowSourceRCTconflicting findings2 other sources

    In a randomized trial of 120 people with obesity, fasting blood glucose decreased in both intervention groups compared with the control group (JRE-1 vs CON MD: −0.35 mmol/L; JRE-2 vs CON MD: −0.32 mmol/L). Studies disagree: a separate randomized trial listed fasting plasma glucose among the measures that did not improve.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Obesity

    Study result

    FBG (JRE-1 = −0.29 ± 0.26 mmol/L, P < 0.05, JRE-2 = −0.26 ± 0.27 mmol/L, P < 0.05) decreased in both intervention groups; JRE-1 vs CON MD: −0.35 (95% CI −0.49 to −0.21, P<0.001), JRE-2 vs CON MD: −0.32 (95% CI −0.46 to −0.18, P<0.001)

    Open Jump Rope Training
    →
  9. PracticesBrisk WalkingCertaintyLowSourceClinical9 other sources

    A 2024 trial reported a 9.2% decrease in fasting glucose in both the exercise and control groups. A 2012 study found fasting blood sugar decreased by 2.82 mg% after 10 weeks of brisk walking; a separate 2020 trial found an HbA1c decrease that was close to statistical significance (p = .09).

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Hypertension
    • Menopause
    • Obesity

    Study result

    The exercise and control group exhibited significant decreases in fasting glucose by 9.2% (p<0.05).

    Open Brisk Walking
    →
  10. PracticesCalisthenicsCertaintyLowSourceClinical4 other sources

    A 2020 randomized trial of 48 participants found mean glucose differed from control immediately after a meal-time bodyweight exercise session. A separate 2022 randomized trial found no changes in glucose or insulin area-under-the-curve during an OGTT, or in HOMA-IR.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Diabetes Type2

    Study result

    Mean glucose in the immediate post-meal bodyweight exercise trial was significantly different to control (P=0.004)

    Open Calisthenics
    →
  11. PracticesHot BathCertaintyLowSourceClinical4 other sources

    A quasi-experimental study of 18 people with diabetes type 2 or overweight found fasting glucose fell by −0.46 mmol/l after the intervention compared with control. A trial of 24 found no between-group difference in changes in fasting or tolerance-test glucose.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Overweight

    Study result

    fasting glucose ( P = 0.04; INT: 4.44 ± 0.93 to 3.98 ± 0.98 mmol/l) ... were lowered after INT compared with CON

    Open Hot Bath
    →
  12. PracticesCupping TherapyCertaintyLowSourceClinical2 other sources

    In a quasi-experimental study of 31 people with metabolic syndrome, fasting blood sugar decreased from 5.0±0.4 at baseline to 4.8±0.4 at one and three months, and 4.7±0.5 at four months.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Metabolic Syndrome

    Study result

    FBS was significantly lower at one month (4.8±0.4), three months (4.8±0.4), and four months (4.7±0.5) compared to baseline (5.0±0.4).

    Open Cupping Therapy
    →
  13. PracticesGrounding / EarthingCertaintyLowSourceClinical2 other sources

    A randomized controlled trial in 168 people with diabetes reported that continuous earthing decreased blood glucose (2011).

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Diabetes

    Study result

    The continuous earthing of the human body decreases blood glucose in patients with diabetes.

    Open Grounding / Earthing
    →
  14. PracticesTENS / EMS TherapyCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source

    A review of 245 people reported that Glycated Hemoglobin decreased within the low-frequency TENS group, but comparisons with placebo were not consistent: one trial found no between-group difference, while another did.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Hypertension
    • Obesity

    Study result

    HbAlc (%): ↓* in Lo-TENS group within-group; between-group vs placebo NS in one trial, significant in another

    Open TENS / EMS Therapy
    →
  15. PracticesInfrared SaunaCertaintyLowSourceClinical2 other sources

    In a 2025 quasi-experimental study involving 14 people with type 2 diabetes, plasma glucose iAUC was lower over the postprandial period following 8 weeks of PHT.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Diabetes Type2

    Study result

    Plasma glucose iAUC was significantly lower over the postprandial period following 8 weeks of PHT (P = 0.024)

    Open Infrared Sauna
    →
  16. PracticesTabata TrainingCertaintyLowSourceClinicalSmall effectconflicting findings4 other sources

    A quasi-experimental study in people with obesity found fasting blood sugar (FBS) lower by 15.2 mg/dl (95% CI = −20.25 to −10.14; p < 0.001). Studies disagree: a randomized trial found no statistically significant change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (−0.38%, 95% CI: −1.08% to 0.33%; p = 0.291).

    How big is the effect

    Small effectA small but noticeable difference on average.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Obesity

    Study result

    FBS [T = −15.2 mg/dl (95% CI = −20.25 to −10.14; p < 0.001)]

    Open Tabata Training
    →
  17. PracticesSwedish (Classic) MassageCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source

    A randomized trial involving 36 people with Diabetes (General) found blood glucose levels were lower in the intervention group than in the control group after the intervention.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Diabetes

    Study result

    the blood glucose levels were lower significantly in intervention group in comparison with control group after intervention (P<0.0001)

    Open Swedish (Classic) Massage
    →
  18. PracticesHot YogaCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source

    A pilot study with 29 participants found a reduced area under the glucose curve after an oral glucose tolerance test in older adults with obesity, but not in young, lean participants.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Obesity

    Study result

    The area under the glucose curve following the oral glucose tolerance test was significantly reduced as a result of the Bikram Yoga intervention in older obese (P < 0.05) but not in young lean subjects.

    Open Hot Yoga
    →
  19. SupplementsChagaCertaintyLowSourceAnimal researchanimal / in-vitro only8 other sources

    In diabetic animal models, IOPH lowered blood glucose by 31% versus the model (8.59 ± 1.55 vs 12.51 ± 1.3 mmol/L, p<0.01). In another model, PIO-30 lowered it to 10.1±3.2 versus 22.2±2.2 mmol/L with STZ (P<0.05), while PIO-20 and PIO-10 were not statistically significant.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Chronic Kidney Disease
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Kidney Disease
    • Obesity

    Dose & course

    21 days

    Who it applies to

    • Animal

    Study result

    FBG decreased by 52.29% vs Model after 4 weeks (SWEPC-H, 300 mg/kg/day)

    Open Chaga
    →
Very low probability(8)
  1. PracticesForest Bathing (Shinrin-yoku)CertaintyVery lowSourceClinical4 other sources

    In a randomized trial involving 36 people, average blood glucose decreased from 4.57 to 4.30 mmol/L after forest bathing (P < 0.0001) and was unchanged after urban bathing. Another randomized trial involving 24 people reported decreases in GLU, TG, and CHO after 7 days of forest therapy compared with 7 days in an urban environment.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Heart Failure
    • Hypertension

    Study result

    Average blood glucose decreased from 4.57 to 4.30 mmol/L after forest bathing (P < 0.0001); unchanged after urban bathing.

    Open Forest Bathing (Shinrin-yoku)
    →
  2. PracticesIce Bath / Cold PlungeCertaintyVery lowSourceClinical1 other source

    A blood-glucose benefit has not been established in healthy participants.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people
    Open Ice Bath / Cold Plunge
    →
  3. PracticesHeating Pads / Warm CompressesCertaintyVery lowSourceClinical1 other source

    A 2026 pilot study found no difference in glucose tolerance between control and intervention (n = 10; glucose area under the curve Control: 7410 ± 6088 mg/dl*180min, Intervention: 8253 ± 2139 mg/dl*180min; P = 0.857); studies did not support this effect.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    Open Heating Pads / Warm Compresses
    →
  4. SupplementsTurkey TailCertaintyVery lowSourceAnimal researchanimal / in-vitro only1 other source

    In animals with metabolic syndrome, blood glucose significantly decreased only at the high dose (p<0.05); medium and low doses were not significant.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Diabetes Type2

    Dose & course

    4 weeks

    Who it applies to

    • Animal

    Study result

    Significantly lower postprandial blood glucose, dose-dependent (exact values not reported in abstract)

    Open Turkey Tail
    →
  5. PracticesLatin Dance FitnessCertaintyVery lowSourceTheoretical2 other sources

    A 2019 trial of 98 healthy participants found no significant improvement in the metabolic panel in either choreographed fitness group; this finding did not support an effect on blood glucose.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people
    Open Latin Dance Fitness
    →
  6. PracticesDanceCertaintyVery lowSourceTheoretical2 other sources

    An RCT involving 58 people with Schizophrenia found no significant interaction effects on fasting glucose (F=2.4, p=0.13), so this study did not support a blood-glucose benefit.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Schizophrenia
    Open Dance
    →
  7. PracticesIndoor RowingCertaintyVery lowSourceTheoretical2 other sources

    In a 2023 randomized trial of 17 participants, fasting glucose changed over time, but not differently between groups. The studies did not support a practice-specific blood-glucose benefit.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    Open Indoor Rowing
    →
  8. PracticesFinnish SaunaCertaintyVery lowSourceTheoretical2 other sources

    Studies did not support blood glucose level support: a 2025 quasi-experimental study of 12 people found glucose levels significantly elevated after sauna (p < 0.001), with capillary glucose, mg/dL, rising from 84.7 to 99.2.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people
    Open Finnish Sauna
    →

Practices compared

Practices with at least one trial of their own for this goal. Ranked by how sure the evidence is, then effect size.Top 10 of 26
PracticeHow sureEffect sizeOwn trialsWhat worked in trials
Hatha YogaCertaintyHighSourceRCT5 trials or pooled analyses3.5–4×/week · 24 weeks
YogaCertaintyMediumSourceRCTLarge effect11 trials or pooled analyses35–60 min · 2–4.5×/week · 1.4–13 weeks
QigongCertaintyMediumSourceRCTLarge effect4 trials or pooled analyses45–53 min · 3–4×/week · 14–23 weeks
Strength TrainingCertaintyMediumSourceMeta-analysisModerate effect9 trials or pooled analyses45–50 min · 3×/week · 8–12 weeks
FastingCertaintyMediumSourceMeta-analysisTrivial effect29 trials or pooled analyses2–7×/week · 0.7–23 weeks
PilatesCertaintyMediumSourceRCT4 trials or pooled analyses50–55 min · 2–3×/week · 10–12 weeks
BreathworkCertaintyMediumSourceClinical2 trials or pooled analyses7–11 weeks
CyclingCertaintyMediumSourceClinical2 trials or pooled analyses3×/week · 10–12 weeks
Laughter Yoga / TherapyCertaintyMediumSourceClinical2 trials or pooled analyses
Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)CertaintyMediumSourceRCT2 trials or pooled analyses13–33 weeks

What worked in trials: From the smallest to the typical amount in the trials that found this benefit. Not the most anyone did, not a target and not a limit.

How to read the evidence

Evidence tier — overall strength of the evidence for the whole compound

  • StrongWell established — backed by strong, consistent human research.
  • ModerateSome genuine support, but mostly from small or lower-quality studies. Promising, not proven.
  • PreliminaryEarly-stage evidence — a promising hypothesis, not an established effect yet.
  • LimitedVery limited evidence — treat this as a hypothesis, not proof.
  • InsufficientNot enough good evidence to draw conclusions yet.

Certainty — how sure we can be that the effect is real

  • Very highVery sure — strong, consistent evidence
  • HighFairly sure — consistent evidence from good studies
  • MediumModerately sure — new studies could change this
  • LowNot sure — little or mixed evidence
  • Very lowVery unsure — almost no usable evidence

Source — where the data comes from

  • Meta-analysisPooled analysis of many trials — the strongest evidence
  • RCTRandomized controlled trial — a strong human study design
  • ClinicalA human clinical study
  • Reference knowledgeFrom general health-science or pharmacology references, not a study of this exact claim
  • Animal researchStudied in animals, not humans
  • Community reportsAggregated user reports — anecdotal signal, not evidence
  • TheoreticalMechanism-based reasoning, not yet tested

Study grade — quality of each underlying study (A best, D weakest)

  • AHigh-quality — strong, consistent human trials
  • BGood — solid evidence with some limitations
  • CModerate — limited, small, or mixed-quality studies
  • DWeak — preliminary, indirect, or animal-only

Confidence — how strongly the sources back a finding

A 0–100 score from study quality and agreement

Most supplement evidence is graded C–D. Read it as preliminary signal, not proof.

Full write-up

What is it

Blood Glucose Level Support refers to changes in laboratory markers related to blood-sugar regulation, including fasting glucose, HbA1c, and fasting insulin. It is a biomarker-based outcome, so changes may differ between markers rather than moving uniformly in the same direction. Apple Cider Vinegar, Vitamin K2, Resveratrol, and Dietary Fiber (Prebiotics) are examples of interventions studied for this outcome.

How interventions help

Interventions associated with this outcome were studied using several markers rather than a single definition of improvement. Changes were most often assessed through fasting glucose and HbA1c, with insulin sometimes moving in the same direction and sometimes remaining unchanged. This means an intervention may affect one aspect of glucose regulation without producing the same pattern across every marker.

Timing varied considerably. Some findings were reported within days, while others were assessed only after weeks or months. The study protocols also differed in how consistently an intervention was used: Resveratrol and Taurine were studied with daily use, whereas several other interventions were not identified as requiring continuous daily use. Studied amounts ranged from 5 mg/day to 1 g/day for Saffron Extract, 3–30 g/day for Dietary Fiber (Prebiotics), and 90 mcg/day for Vitamin K2, illustrating that doses are not directly comparable across interventions.

The observed changes also differed in size and scope. Apple Cider Vinegar, Black Seed Oil, Saffron Extract, Aloe Vera, and Psyllium Husk were associated with lower fasting glucose or HbA1c, while Vitamin K2 showed a pattern involving HbA1c and fasting insulin without a change in fasting glucose. Yoga was studied in people with a clinical condition, so its findings may not apply equally to people without that context. One Spirulina protocol included 6 months supplementation followed by 6 months follow-up and reported persistence after stopping; that longer-term pattern should not be assumed for other interventions.

Choosing guidance

When comparing options, look beyond the direction of the reported effect. Some have been studied as acute or near-term interventions, while others were evaluated only after several weeks or months. A faster onset may matter for someone interested in a short-term response, whereas options requiring consistent daily use over a longer period are better matched to someone willing to maintain a routine and assess changes later. The amounts used in studies also vary substantially, so a product label may not correspond closely to the research format.

Human evidence is especially important for deciding how applicable an option may be. Several interventions have been studied in people, including some in clinical-condition or mixed populations, but this does not mean the findings apply equally to someone who is healthy or has a different condition. Options supported only by animal studies, such as Cordyceps, Chaga, Reishi, and Rhodiola Rosea, should be viewed as preliminary rather than as established choices for human blood glucose support.

The evidence is not equally consistent across all options. Some interventions have conflicting findings across studies, including Selenium, Whey Protein, Berberine, Curcumin, Omega-3, Magnesium, and several others. That makes the study population, outcome measured, and duration of follow-up more important than relying on a single positive result. Lifestyle approaches such as Yoga, Tai Chi, and Cycling may suit readers looking for non-supplement options, while supplement choices may suit those comparing specific study-tested preparations; in either case, the closest match between the studied population and the intended use is the most useful starting point.

Diatelos provides general wellness information based on published research. It is not medical advice. Talk to a clinician before starting any new supplement or practice, especially if you have a health condition, are pregnant, or take medication.