mind
Working Memory Improvement
Working Memory Improvement refers to better performance on tasks that assess working memory: holding and using information over a short period. It describes an outcome, not a specific treatment, product, or diagnosis, and it is distinct from a general claim of improved memory in every situation.
A focused look at Working Memory Improvement and its place within the mind category.
These are research findings, not promises. Most options have little evidence, and results differ from person to person.
What may help
What studies found for each option, best evidence first.
21 options:3 some evidence2 mixed13 not enough evidence1 not tested in people2 no benefit found
CardiopracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Medium
Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.
All 7 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
Open the Cardio pageRed Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)practiceSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Large
Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.
All 2 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
Open the Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation) pageHatha YogapracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Not known
Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.
All 2 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.
After 8 weeks, a randomized trial of 118 healthy adults found better working-memory capacity and efficiency of mental set shifting and flexibility with yoga than with stretching-strengthening. A separate randomized trial of 59 people found only mixing costs decreased, indicating easier retrieval of task sets from working memory.
Open the Hatha Yoga pageHigh-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)practiceMixed resultsSize of effect: Small
Studies disagree: some found a benefit, others found none. Do not count on it.
6 of 8 studies found a benefit; 2 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
A pooled analysis that included randomized and non-randomized human studies found a small improvement in working memory among children and adolescents. Findings disagree: another pooled analysis of randomized trials found no significant working-memory effect.
Open the High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) pageBrain Games / PuzzlespracticeMixed resultsSize of effect: Not known
Studies disagree: some found a benefit, others found none. Do not count on it.
3 of 4 studies found a benefit; 1 found none. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.
In a randomized trial of 44 people, working-memory performance on a digit span task improved with aerobic exercise and improved further when cognitive activities were added, compared with control (13%). A second trial of 32 found better working-memory measures with one game program than with another.
Open the Brain Games / Puzzles pageTai ChipracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
4 of 5 studies found a benefit; 1 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
A pooled analysis whose study designs were not recorded found improvement on the digital span forward test in 2024, and a 2025 trial of 75 people reported lower working-memory scores on the BRIEF. However, a pooled analysis of randomized trials found no improvement in working memory, concentration, or memory complaints.
Open the Tai Chi pageDancepracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
The one study found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
A pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded found greater working-memory improvement with Zumba than with treadmill exercise among 40 people in its analysis (g=0.34), an effect classified as small.
Open the Dance pageBinaural BeatspracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
2 of 4 studies found a benefit; 2 found none. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.
In a randomized trial of 28 people, listening to 15Hz Binaural Beats improved accuracy by 3% over the course of 5 minutes. A separate trial of 29 people found a 0.40-unit increase in working memory function that was not significant, so the findings are not consistent.
Open the Binaural Beats page
Comparing practices
- CardioSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Medium6 trials
- Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)Some evidence it helpsSize of effect: Large2 trials
- High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)Mixed resultsSize of effect: Small6 trials
The expert view shows every study, dose protocol and source.
What may help
Linked to improving it21 listedStart here
Most likely to help, from the evidence we have
- →PracticesCardioCertaintyMediumSourceMeta-analysisModerate effect7 other sources
Pooled analyses whose designs were not recorded found improved working-memory performance, including a reaction-time result where lower scores indicate better performance (SMD = -0.52, 95% CI [-0.82, -0.21], p < 0.05). The findings came from people with schizophrenia and other studied populations, rather than establishing the same effect for everyone.
How big is the effect
Moderate effectA clear difference on average.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Schizophrenia
Open CardioStudy result
Working memory: SMD = -0.52, 95% CI [-0.82, -0.21], p < 0.05, I² = 53% (reaction time based, lower is better).
- →PracticesRed Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)CertaintyMediumSourceRCTLarge effect2 other sources
A 2025 meta-analysis of randomized trials found improved working memory span among 820 people in the outcome analysis (SMD = 1.41). A separate review reported higher accuracy in
How big is the effect
Large effectA big difference on average. Check how strong the evidence is.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Alzheimers Disease
- Mild Cognitive Impairment
- Parkinsons Disease
Open Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)Study result
working memory span (SMD = 1.41, 95% CI: 0.78 to 2.04, P < 0.0001)
- →PracticesHigh-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)CertaintyMediumSourceRCTSmall effectconflicting findings8 other sources
A pooled analysis that included randomized and non-randomized human studies found a small improvement in working memory among children and adolescents. Findings disagree: another pooled analysis of randomized trials found no significant working-memory effect.
How big is the effect
Small effectA small but noticeable difference on average.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Breast Cancer
- Copd
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Diabetes Type2
- Heart Failure
- Obesity
- +5 more
Open High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)Study result
HIIT group had moderate to large effect sizes for executive function and working memory.
- →PracticesBrain Games / PuzzlesCertaintyMediumSourceClinical4 other sources
In a randomized trial of 44 people, working-memory performance on a digit span task improved with aerobic exercise and improved further when cognitive activities were added, compared with control (13%). A second trial of 32 found better working-memory measures with one game program than with another.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Mild Cognitive Impairment
Open Brain Games / PuzzlesStudy result
the assessment of working memory using the digit span task revealed a positive effect of aerobic exercises, which further improved when combined with cognitive activities compared with the control group.
- →PracticesHatha YogaCertaintyMediumSourceClinical2 other sources
After 8 weeks, a randomized trial of 118 healthy adults found better working-memory capacity and efficiency of mental set shifting and flexibility with yoga than with stretching-strengthening. A separate randomized trial of 59 people found only mixing costs decreased, indicating easier retrieval of task sets from working memory.
Who was studied
- Healthy people
Open Hatha YogaStudy result
Following 8 weeks of yoga practice, participants in the yoga intervention group showed significantly improved performance on the executive function measures of working memory capacity and efficiency of mental set shifting and flexibility compared with their stretching-strengthening counterparts.
Low probability(14)
- →PracticesTai ChiCertaintyLowSourceRCTconflicting findings5 other sources
A pooled analysis whose study designs were not recorded found improvement on the digital span forward test (MD: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.48) in 2024, and a 2025 trial of 75 people reported lower working-memory scores on the BRIEF. However, a pooled analysis of randomized trials found no improvement in working memory, concentration, or memory complaints.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
Open Tai ChiStudy result
Digital span forward test showed significant improvement (MD: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.47 to 1.48; p=0.0001; I^2=99%)
- →PracticesDanceCertaintyLowSourceRCT1 other source
A pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded found greater working-memory improvement with Zumba than with treadmill exercise among 40 people in its analysis (g=0.34), an effect classified as small.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
Open DanceStudy result
Zumba demonstrated greater improvement in working memory compared with treadmill exercise (g=0.34)
- →PracticesBinaural BeatsCertaintyLowSourceClinical4 other sources
In a randomized trial of 28 people, listening to 15Hz Binaural Beats improved accuracy by 3% over the course of 5 minutes. A separate trial of 29 people found a 0.40-unit increase in working memory function that was not significant (P=0.1), so the findings are not consistent.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
Open Binaural BeatsStudy result
Listening to 15Hz BB positively influenced the participants’ accuracy during the course of the 5 minutes by 3%.
- →PracticesFocused Attention MeditationCertaintyLowSourceClinical3 other sources
A 2024 trial found improved Digit span performance after meditation compared with the control group. A 2021 trial found better performance under medium working-memory demand, but not under high or low demand.
Who was studied
- Healthy people
Open Focused Attention MeditationStudy result
For working memory, the meditation group significantly improved their Digit span performance post-intervention compared to the control group, as evidenced by a significant time x group interaction, F(1,36) = 5.437, p = 0.025, η_p^2 = 0.131.
- →PracticesCyclingCertaintyLowSourceClinical2 other sources
A randomized trial of 55 people found a change in digit span (9 ± 21%, P = 0.031).
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Autism Spectrum
Open CyclingStudy result
digit span (9 ± 21%, P = 0.031)
- →PracticesYogaCertaintyLowSourceClinical2 other sources
A 2026 randomized trial involving 64 people found an increase in Corsi span in the experimental group, indicating improved spatial working memory; the control group showed no significant change.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Migraine
Open YogaStudy result
The experimental group showed a significant increase in Corsi span (t = - 3.97, df = 62, 95% CI [- 0.7, - 0.23], p < 0.001), indicating enhanced spatial working memory. In contrast, the control group showed no significant change in Corsi span.
- →PracticesLaughter Yoga / TherapyCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
A review pooling randomized and non-randomized human studies reported enhanced verbal working memory. The reviewed studies included people with anxiety disorders or autism spectrum disorder.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Anxiety Disorder
- Autism Spectrum
Open Laughter Yoga / TherapyStudy result
enhanced verbal working memory
- →PracticesMindfulness MeditationCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
A trial with 89 participants found improvement on Letter-Number Sequencing from baseline to post-intervention, with the improvement still present at follow-up.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
Open Mindfulness MeditationStudy result
Linear mixed model analyses showed significant time effects in Letter-Number Sequencing (p = .04)... These improvements were observed from baseline to post-intervention and still persisted at follow-up.
- →PracticesForest Bathing (Shinrin-yoku)CertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
An RCT with 60 participants reported a Digit Span Backward Test result of [F(1,57) = 6.164, p = 0.016].
Who was studied
- People with a condition
Open Forest Bathing (Shinrin-yoku)Study result
Digit Span Backward Test [F(1,57) = 6.164, p = 0.016]
- →PracticesAlternate Nostril Breathing (Nadi Shodhana)CertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
An RCT of 40 healthy participants found accuracy in the 2-back condition improved by 6.62% after Alternate Nostril Breathing. The reported change was specific to this working-memory task.
Who was studied
- Healthy people
Open Alternate Nostril Breathing (Nadi Shodhana)Study result
accuracy was improved in the 2-back condition after ANB (6%)
- →PracticesMeditationCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
AOSPAN working memory: 55.68 ± 17.14 vs 65.11 ± 16.18, t(36) = 2.62, p = 0.013, d = 0.43; repeated testing cannot be excluded
- →PracticesBreathworkCertaintyLowSourceReview1 other source
A review describes an 8–9% improvement in cognition associated with memory consolidation, but human evidence has not been established for this finding.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
Open BreathworkStudy result
SYB practice improves cognition (8–9%) associated with memory consolidation and enhances cardiac function, which is essential for effectively completing mental tasks (Singh)
- →PracticesStrength TrainingCertaintyLowSourceReview1 other source
A review reported that PRET improved working memory, inhibitory control and selective attention compared with mFC.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
Open Strength TrainingStudy result
PRET led to significant improvements in working memory, inhibitory control, and selective attention compared with mFC
- →PracticesExpressive WritingCertaintyLowSourceTheoretical1 other source
Expert guidance proposes that expressive writing may improve working memory capacity by reducing intrusive thoughts and cognitive load.
Open Expressive WritingStudy result
Expressive writing can improve working memory capacity by reducing intrusive thoughts and cognitive load.
Very low probability(2)
- →PracticesQigongCertaintyVery lowSourceClinical2 other sources
A 2023 quasi-experimental study of 41 healthy participants reported that aspects of working memory tended to improve, but studies did not support a working-memory improvement.
Open QigongWho was studied
- Healthy people
- →PracticesHot BathCertaintyVery lowSourceClinical1 other source
A quasi-experimental study of 19 people found that short-term and visual recognition memories were maintained in both age groups. The findings did not show improved working memory.
Open Hot BathWho was studied
- Healthy people
Practices compared
Practices with at least one trial of their own for this goal. Ranked by how sure the evidence is, then effect size.Top 10 of 16| Practice | How sure | Effect size | Own trials | What worked in trials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation) | CertaintyMediumSourceRCT | Large effect | 2 trials or pooled analyses | |
| Cardio | CertaintyMediumSourceMeta-analysis | Moderate effect | 6 trials or pooled analyses | 40–60 min · 2.5–4×/week · 12–16 weeks |
| High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) | CertaintyMediumSourceRCT | Small effect | 6 trials or pooled analyses | 15–20 min · 2.7–3.2×/week · 7–8 weeks |
| Brain Games / Puzzles | CertaintyMediumSourceClinical | 2 trials or pooled analyses | 15–23 min · 2–3.5×/week · 4–6 weeks | |
| Hatha Yoga | CertaintyMediumSourceClinical | 2 trials or pooled analyses | 60 min · 3×/week · 8 weeks | |
| Tai Chi | CertaintyLowSourceRCT | 3 trials or pooled analyses | 3×/week · 12–26 weeks | |
| Binaural Beats | CertaintyLowSourceClinical | 2 trials or pooled analyses | ||
| Focused Attention Meditation | CertaintyLowSourceClinical | 2 trials or pooled analyses | ||
| Alternate Nostril Breathing (Nadi Shodhana) | CertaintyLowSourceClinical | 1 trial or pooled analysis | ||
| Cycling | CertaintyLowSourceClinical | 1 trial or pooled analysis |
What worked in trials: From the smallest to the typical amount in the trials that found this benefit. Not the most anyone did, not a target and not a limit.
How to read the evidence
Evidence tier — overall strength of the evidence for the whole compound
- StrongWell established — backed by strong, consistent human research.
- ModerateSome genuine support, but mostly from small or lower-quality studies. Promising, not proven.
- PreliminaryEarly-stage evidence — a promising hypothesis, not an established effect yet.
- LimitedVery limited evidence — treat this as a hypothesis, not proof.
- InsufficientNot enough good evidence to draw conclusions yet.
Certainty — how sure we can be that the effect is real
- Very highVery sure — strong, consistent evidence
- HighFairly sure — consistent evidence from good studies
- MediumModerately sure — new studies could change this
- LowNot sure — little or mixed evidence
- Very lowVery unsure — almost no usable evidence
Source — where the data comes from
- Meta-analysisPooled analysis of many trials — the strongest evidence
- RCTRandomized controlled trial — a strong human study design
- ClinicalA human clinical study
- Reference knowledgeFrom general health-science or pharmacology references, not a study of this exact claim
- Animal researchStudied in animals, not humans
- Community reportsAggregated user reports — anecdotal signal, not evidence
- TheoreticalMechanism-based reasoning, not yet tested
Study grade — quality of each underlying study (A best, D weakest)
- AHigh-quality — strong, consistent human trials
- BGood — solid evidence with some limitations
- CModerate — limited, small, or mixed-quality studies
- DWeak — preliminary, indirect, or animal-only
Confidence — how strongly the sources back a finding
A 0–100 score from study quality and agreement
Most supplement evidence is graded C–D. Read it as preliminary signal, not proof.
Full write-up
What is it
Working Memory Improvement refers to better performance on tasks that assess working memory: holding and using information over a short period. It describes an outcome, not a specific treatment, product, or diagnosis, and it is distinct from a general claim of improved memory in every situation. Research in this area includes several mind-related interventions.
How interventions help
Interventions linked with working memory improvement differ substantially in timing and continuity. Some findings followed a single acute dose, with changes assessed immediately or within a few hours. Others involved repeated use over days or weeks, including courses lasting 6 weeks, 10 days, 12 weeks, or 180 days. Tai Chi and Cycling represent activity-based approaches rather than supplements, so the evidence covers more than one type of intervention.
The outcome was assessed using different memory tasks and scoring methods, meaning the reported changes are not directly interchangeable. Some studies reported improved test performance, while others reported differences in recall or score-based measures. The size and interpretation of a change therefore depend on the task used and the study design.
Continuous use is not a universal requirement: several interventions were examined after a single dose or short exposure, whereas others were taken daily during a defined course. Persistence after stopping is also not established uniformly; one prenatal Choline (Bitartrate) finding reported a permanent effect, but this should not be generalized to the other interventions or to different populations.
Applicability varies because participants included healthy people, mixed-health groups, and groups whose health status was not specified. Results from one population, timing pattern, or memory test may therefore not translate directly to every person or setting.
Choosing guidance
Choose among these options by matching the study pattern to your goal. Some were examined after a single dose or over only a short period, while others were studied with daily use across several weeks or longer. A short, acute study may be more relevant to someone seeking a near-term effect, whereas longer protocols are more relevant to people willing to maintain a routine; neither design establishes that the benefit will persist outside the studied period.
The options also differ in how directly they apply to people. Tai Chi, Choline (Bitartrate), Bacopa Monnieri, American Ginseng, Ashwagandha, Beetroot Extract, Ginkgo Biloba, L-Theanine, Lavender Extract, Lemon Balm (Melissa), Magnesium, Cycling, Hatha Yoga, Creatine, and MCT Oil have human evidence recorded. Other options rely on reviews, theoretical support, animal research, or evidence that is not classified as direct human evidence, so they are less suitable when human applicability is the main priority.
Health status matters when interpreting the choices. Evidence from healthy adults, mixed groups, or unspecified populations may not transfer to people with a particular condition. Omega-3, for example, was studied in clinical-condition populations, so its findings should not automatically be generalized to healthy adults. Similarly, results associated with a specific age subgroup or patient population may not apply broadly.
No listed option is flagged for conflicting evidence, but that does not make all findings equally dependable. When studies are few, samples are small, effect sizes or statistical details are unavailable, or the evidence comes mainly from a review rather than direct trials, choose with greater uncertainty. The most practical comparison is therefore speed, commitment to a sustained routine, population match, and how directly the evidence reflects humans like you.