Skip to content

health

HDL Cholesterol Increase

HDL Cholesterol Increase means a higher measured level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. It describes a change in a cholesterol measurement, rather than a symptom that a person necessarily notices or a diagnosis by itself.

HDL Cholesterol Increase describes a health-related effect focused on higher HDL cholesterol.

These are research findings, not promises. Most options have little evidence, and results differ from person to person.

What may help

What studies found for each option, best evidence first.

24 options:3 some evidence12 not enough evidence2 not tested in people7 no benefit found

  • YogapracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Not known

    Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.

    All 8 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    A 2025 pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded found higher HDL cholesterol among 13,235 people. Another pooled analysis reported an increase of +0.06 mmol/L.

    Open the Yoga page
  • SwimmingpracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Not known

    Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.

    All 3 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    A review reported favorable effects of swimming on HDL cholesterol, but a pooled comparison ranked swimming fourth for this outcome and found dance had a better effect.

    Open the Swimming page
  • QigongpracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Large

    Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.

    All 3 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    A 2023 meta-analysis of randomized trials found higher HDL cholesterol among 486 people in its analysis. A 2021 review also reported higher blood high-density lipoprotein in obese women with diabetes.

    Open the Qigong page
  • High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)practiceNot enough evidence

    Too few or too small studies to know if it works.

    21 of 32 studies found a benefit; 11 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    Pooled analyses of randomized trials found small increases in HDL, including 0.04 mmol/L in an analysis of 4,213 people and 0.07 mmol/L in an analysis of 296 people. Findings disagree: a separate pooled analysis involving 1,192 people did not find a statistically significant increase.

    Open the High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) page
  • FastingpracticeNot enough evidence

    Too few or too small studies to know if it works.

    7 of 14 studies found a benefit; 7 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    Open the Fasting page
  • CardiopracticeNot enough evidence

    Too few or too small studies to know if it works.

    8 of 11 studies found a benefit; 3 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials found high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased by 2.4 mg/dL, and another pooled analysis found a greater increase among postmenopausal women. A separate pooled analysis of randomized trials did not find a significant HDL change, so results were mixed.

    Open the Cardio page
  • Tai ChipracticeNot enough evidence

    Too few or too small studies to know if it works.

    4 of 7 studies found a benefit; 3 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    Open the Tai Chi page
  • Strength TrainingpracticeNot enough evidence

    Too few or too small studies to know if it works.

    2 of 4 studies found a benefit; 2 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials found HDL cholesterol improved compared with standard treatment among 1,180 people in its outcome analysis. Findings differ by comparison: a pooled analysis in postmenopausal women found aerobic exercise improved HDL-C, while other interventions did not differ significantly in pairwise comparisons.

    Open the Strength Training page

Comparing practices

  • YogaSome evidence it helps8 trials
  • SwimmingSome evidence it helps2 trials
  • QigongSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Large3 trials

The expert view shows every study, dose protocol and source.

What may help

Linked to improving it24 listed

Start here

Most likely to help, from the evidence we have

  1. PracticesYogaCertaintyMediumSourceRCT8 other sources

    A 2025 pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded found higher HDL cholesterol among 13,235 people (MD: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.69 to 3.19). Another pooled analysis reported an increase of +0.06 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.10).

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Atrial Fibrillation
    • Coronary Artery Disease
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Dyslipidemia
    • Heart Disease
    • Hypertension
    • +5 more

    Study result

    people practicing yoga showed higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.69 to 3.19, I2 = 93%, P < 0.001)

    Open Yoga
    →
  2. PracticesSwimmingCertaintyMediumSourceRCT3 other sources

    A review reported favorable effects of swimming on HDL cholesterol, but a pooled comparison ranked swimming fourth for this outcome and found dance had a better effect.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition

    Study result

    For HDL cholesterol, dance showed a better effect. Swimming SUCRA for HDL-C was 0.587, ranking 4th.

    Open Swimming
    →
  3. PracticesQigongCertaintyMediumSourceRCTLarge effect3 other sources

    A 2023 meta-analysis of randomized trials found higher HDL cholesterol among 486 people in its analysis (SMD = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.06–1.85). A 2021 review also reported higher blood high-density lipoprotein in obese women with diabetes.

    How big is the effect

    Large effectA big difference on average. Check how strong the evidence is.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Breast Cancer
    • Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
    • Diabetes
    • Fibromyalgia
    • Metabolic Syndrome
    • Osteoarthritis

    Study result

    high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (SMD = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.06–1.85)

    Open Qigong
    →
Low probability(14)
  1. PracticesCardioCertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisSmall effectconflicting findings11 other sources

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials found high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased by 2.4 mg/dL (95% CI: 1.0 to 3.8), and another pooled analysis found a greater increase among postmenopausal women. A separate pooled analysis of randomized trials did not find a significant HDL change, so results were mixed.

    How big is the effect

    Small effectA small but noticeable difference on average.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Menopause
    • Obesity
    • Overweight
    • Pcos

    Study result

    high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased by 2.4 mg/dL (95% CI: 1.0 to 3.8)

    Open Cardio
    →
  2. PracticesFastingCertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisTrivial effectconflicting findings14 other sources

    A meta-analysis of randomized trials found an HDL increase of WMD: 0.04 mmol/l in 2,032 people, while another pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded reported +0.1 mmol/L. A separate pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded found no significant difference in HDL-C (MD = 0.03 mmol/L; 95% CI, −0.16 to 0.21; p=0.783).

    How big is the effect

    Trivial effectReal in studies, but too small for most people to notice.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Diabetes
    • Fatty Liver Nafld
    • Hypertension
    • Metabolic Syndrome
    • Obesity
    • Prediabetes

    Study result

    IF significantly increased high-density lipoproteins [WMD: 0.04 mmol/l] when compared with CON

    Open Fasting
    →
  3. PracticesHigh-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)CertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisSmall effectconflicting findings32 other sources

    Pooled analyses of randomized trials found small increases in HDL, including 0.04 mmol/L in an analysis of 4,213 people and 0.07 mmol/L in an analysis of 296 people. Findings disagree: a separate pooled analysis involving 1,192 people did not find a statistically significant increase.

    How big is the effect

    Small effectA small but noticeable difference on average.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Asthma
    • Cancer
    • Coronary Artery Disease
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Fatty Liver Nafld
    • +10 more

    Study result

    high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels [MD: 0.04 mmol L−1, p = 0.002]

    Open High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)
    →
  4. PracticesTai ChiCertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisModerate effectconflicting findings7 other sources

    A pooled analysis whose study designs were not recorded found higher HDL-C (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI [0.28, 0.79]) among 248 people in its outcome analysis in 2023. Results were mixed: a pooled analysis of randomized trials involving 795 people in its outcome analysis found no statistically significant difference in 2026.

    How big is the effect

    Moderate effectA clear difference on average.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Breast Cancer
    • Coronary Artery Disease
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Dyslipidemia
    • Hyperglycemia
    • Hypertension
    • +3 more

    Study result

    while increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD = 0.09, p ...

    Open Tai Chi
    →
  5. PracticesStrength TrainingCertaintyLowSourceRCTSmall effectconflicting findings4 other sources

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials found HDL cholesterol improved compared with standard treatment among 1,180 people in its outcome analysis. Findings differ by comparison: a pooled analysis in postmenopausal women found aerobic exercise improved HDL-C, while other interventions did not differ significantly in pairwise comparisons.

    How big is the effect

    Small effectA small but noticeable difference on average.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Menopause
    • Metabolic Syndrome
    • Overweight

    Study result

    high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (standardised mean differences (SMD) +0.40 mg/dL, 95% CI 0.07 to -0.72) improved compared with standard treatment. The abstract prints the CI as '0.07 to -0.72', which is internally inconsistent; the reported direction is taken from the stated improvement.

    Open Strength Training
    →
  6. PracticesTabata TrainingCertaintyLowSourceRCTLarge effect1 other source

    A 2023 randomized trial of 122 healthy participants found higher HDL cholesterol, with a large effect (d = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.42).

    How big is the effect

    Large effectA big difference on average. Check how strong the evidence is.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people

    Study result

    high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (p < 0.001, d = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.42)

    Open Tabata Training
    →
  7. PracticesBrisk WalkingCertaintyLowSourceClinical4 other sources

    A 2022 trial found HDL-C improved across walking conditions, and the effect remained after the 12-week retention period. A 2013 quasi-experimental study also found serum HDL-cholesterol increased within the walking group.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Menopause

    Study result

    All walking conditions improved high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ... (all P < 0.001); however, after the 12-week retention period only the training effects of HDL-C (P < 0.05) ... remained robust.

    Open Brisk Walking
    →
  8. PracticesFinnish SaunaCertaintyLowSourceClinical4 other sources

    Two quasi-experimental studies reported increases in HDL cholesterol after repeated sauna baths, including a 23.6% increase in a study of 12 people. Findings differ: a 2014 study of 16 people found that HDL remained only slightly increased after the 10th session, without statistical significance.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people

    Study result

    concentration of HDLC increased after 7th sauna bath in group I.

    Open Finnish Sauna
    →
  9. PracticesHatha YogaCertaintyLowSourceClinicalconflicting findings6 other sources

    A randomized trial of 38 people found HDL-cholesterol did not decrease in the yoga group, while a small quasi-experimental study reported HDL-C increased after training. Results conflict: a randomized trial of 231 people found no significant difference in HDL.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Chronic Kidney Disease
    • Diabetes Type2

    Study result

    The concentration of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was decreased in the diet group significantly but not in yoga (P = 0.006).

    Open Hatha Yoga
    →
  10. PracticesMeditationCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source

    Increases of HDL-c concentration in mindfulness but not controls conditions (7; 2, 10 mg/mL vs. −1; −2, 3 mg/mL; p = 0.024)... Decreases in serum ghrelin (−0.71 ± 0.37 vs. 0.83 ± 0.75 pg/mL; p = 0.026) and cortisol (−1.42 ± 0.94 vs. 2.26 ± 0.93 µg/dL; p = 0.015)

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    Open Meditation
    →
  11. PracticesMindfulness MeditationCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source

    A quasi-experimental study in 74 healthy participants reported HDL levels of 63 ± 13 vs. 69 ± 14 mg/dL.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people

    Study result

    significant variations in HDL (63 ± 13 vs. 69 ± 14 mg/dL, p = 0.048)

    Open Mindfulness Meditation
    →
  12. PracticesLaughter Yoga / TherapyCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source

    A 2026 quasi-experimental study of 64 healthy participants reported increased high-density lipoprotein levels.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people

    Study result

    High-density lipoprotein levels were significantly increased (P = 0.027)

    Open Laughter Yoga / Therapy
    →
  13. SupplementsChagaCertaintyLowSourceAnimal researchanimal / in-vitro only2 other sources

    In animal models, HDL was 0.77 ± 0.22 mmol/L with IOPH versus 0.35 ± 0.09 mmol/L in the model, while HIOP produced a 49.2% increase versus HFD (2.76 ± 0.37 vs 1.85 ± 0.14 mmol/L).

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Dyslipidemia
    • Kidney Disease

    Dose & course

    8 weeks

    Who it applies to

    • Animal

    Study result

    HDL-C significantly higher than MG (p<0.05); no numeric values reported

    Open Chaga
    →
  14. PracticesCyclingCertaintyLowSourceTheoretical1 other source

    A proposed effect of sustained aerobic training is a modest rise in HDL cholesterol alongside lower triglycerides, with larger effects at higher weekly volume.

    Study result

    Sustained aerobic training modestly raises HDL cholesterol and lowers triglycerides, with larger effects at higher weekly volume.

    Open Cycling
    →
Very low probability(7)
  1. PracticesRed Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)CertaintyVery lowSourceRCT1 other source

    No human evidence is reported for an increase in HDL cholesterol; the cited research concerns people with obesity.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Obesity
    Open Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)
    →
  2. PracticesDanceCertaintyVery lowSourceRCT1 other source

    A pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded reported conflicting statistical details for HDL-C in people with Hypertension (High Blood Pressure): its abstract gave MD = 0.20, 95% CI (−0.02, 0.42), p < 0.0001, while Table 2 gave p = 0.08 and a confidence interval crossing zero. This finding does not clearly support an increase.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    Open Dance
    →
  3. PracticesPilatesCertaintyVery lowSourceRCT1 other source

    There is no human evidence for an increase in HDL cholesterol from Pilates.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Diabetes
    • Obesity
    Open Pilates
    →
  4. PracticesCupping TherapyCertaintyVery lowSourceRCT1 other source

    Human study findings do not establish that Cupping Therapy increases HDL cholesterol.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Metabolic Syndrome
    Open Cupping Therapy
    →
  5. PracticesCalisthenicsCertaintyVery lowSourceRCT2 other sources

    An RCT in 60 people with obesity found no significant group-by-time interaction for HDL, so the studies did not support an increase.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Obesity
    Open Calisthenics
    →
  6. PracticesJump Rope TrainingCertaintyVery lowSourceRCT1 other source

    Studies did not support an increase in HDL-C: an RCT of 129 participants with obesity reported a change of MD -0.01 mmol/L.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Obesity
    Open Jump Rope Training
    →
  7. PracticesSocial DancingCertaintyVery lowSourceTheoretical2 other sources

    A systematic review of randomized trials in people with hypertension did not support an increase in HDL cholesterol: the confidence interval crossed zero (MD = 0.20, 95% CI (−0.02, 0.42)), and the paper's own table gives p = 0.08.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Hypertension
    Open Social Dancing
    →

Practices compared

Practices with at least one trial of their own for this goal. Ranked by how sure the evidence is, then effect size.Top 10 of 14
PracticeHow sureEffect sizeOwn trialsWhat worked in trials
QigongCertaintyMediumSourceRCTLarge effect3 trials or pooled analyses60 min · 3–3.5×/week · 12–14 weeks
YogaCertaintyMediumSourceRCT8 trials or pooled analyses30–45 min · 3–3.5×/week · 1.4–13 weeks
SwimmingCertaintyMediumSourceRCT2 trials or pooled analyses
Tabata TrainingCertaintyLowSourceRCTLarge effect1 trial or pooled analysis
Tai ChiCertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisModerate effect4 trials or pooled analyses60 min · 3×/week · 12–29 weeks
High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)CertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisSmall effect19 trials or pooled analyses16–28 min · 2–3×/week · 2–12 weeks
CardioCertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisSmall effect7 trials or pooled analyses1.1–3.5×/week · 2–16 weeks
Strength TrainingCertaintyLowSourceRCTSmall effect2 trials or pooled analyses
FastingCertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisTrivial effect7 trials or pooled analyses7×/week · 4–26 weeks
Brisk WalkingCertaintyLowSourceClinical3 trials or pooled analyses

What worked in trials: From the smallest to the typical amount in the trials that found this benefit. Not the most anyone did, not a target and not a limit.

How to read the evidence

Evidence tier — overall strength of the evidence for the whole compound

  • StrongWell established — backed by strong, consistent human research.
  • ModerateSome genuine support, but mostly from small or lower-quality studies. Promising, not proven.
  • PreliminaryEarly-stage evidence — a promising hypothesis, not an established effect yet.
  • LimitedVery limited evidence — treat this as a hypothesis, not proof.
  • InsufficientNot enough good evidence to draw conclusions yet.

Certainty — how sure we can be that the effect is real

  • Very highVery sure — strong, consistent evidence
  • HighFairly sure — consistent evidence from good studies
  • MediumModerately sure — new studies could change this
  • LowNot sure — little or mixed evidence
  • Very lowVery unsure — almost no usable evidence

Source — where the data comes from

  • Meta-analysisPooled analysis of many trials — the strongest evidence
  • RCTRandomized controlled trial — a strong human study design
  • ClinicalA human clinical study
  • Reference knowledgeFrom general health-science or pharmacology references, not a study of this exact claim
  • Animal researchStudied in animals, not humans
  • Community reportsAggregated user reports — anecdotal signal, not evidence
  • TheoreticalMechanism-based reasoning, not yet tested

Study grade — quality of each underlying study (A best, D weakest)

  • AHigh-quality — strong, consistent human trials
  • BGood — solid evidence with some limitations
  • CModerate — limited, small, or mixed-quality studies
  • DWeak — preliminary, indirect, or animal-only

Confidence — how strongly the sources back a finding

A 0–100 score from study quality and agreement

Most supplement evidence is graded C–D. Read it as preliminary signal, not proof.

Full write-up

What is it

HDL Cholesterol Increase means a higher measured level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. It describes a change in a cholesterol measurement, rather than a symptom that a person necessarily notices or a diagnosis by itself. This outcome should not be confused with a general increase in all types of cholesterol.

How interventions help

Interventions associated with higher HDL cholesterol include movement practices such as Yoga, Tai Chi, and Swimming, as well as several supplements. These approaches are not interchangeable: the movement-based findings come from activity programs, while supplement findings were observed with specific products and study regimens. The evidence includes people with clinical conditions as well as groups whose health status was not specified, so the results may not apply equally to everyone.

Changes generally appeared over weeks rather than immediately. For example, Melatonin was studied at 3-10 mg/day for 6-12 weeks, Spirulina at 1-6 g/day for 6-12 weeks, and Astaxanthin at 6-12 mg/day for 8-24 weeks. Other interventions were followed for longer or across a much wider range of durations, including Garlic from 3 weeks to 1 year and Milk Thistle (Silymarin) from 45 days to 2 years. These time frames describe how long participants used an intervention before HDL cholesterol was assessed; they do not establish a universal schedule or dose.

The size and consistency of change also differ. Some findings describe a small increase, while others report larger or more moderate changes. Garlic has conflicting evidence, and Omega-3 and Tai Chi also have conflicting findings, meaning results have not been uniform across studies. For Omega-3, the studies covered mixed health conditions and a median trial duration of 13 weeks. The observed outcome is an increase in HDL cholesterol, but the evidence does not establish that every intervention will produce the same change or that an increase alone translates into a broader health benefit.

Choosing guidance

Choosing among these options depends on more than the reported direction of change. First consider whether the evidence comes from human studies, particularly randomized controlled trials, or from animal studies, reviews, or reference material. Human findings are more directly relevant to people, while animal and review-based entries are better viewed as preliminary rather than as evidence of a comparable effect in humans.

The time and amount studied also vary substantially. Some interventions were evaluated over several weeks, while others were followed for months or longer, and supplement doses range from small amounts to relatively high daily amounts. This makes direct comparisons difficult: an option studied for a short period may not answer the same question as one assessed after sustained use. The table and individual entries provide the specific study conditions to check before drawing comparisons.

Applicability matters as well. Evidence drawn from clinical conditions or mixed health groups may not translate equally to someone without those characteristics. People prioritizing direct human evidence may focus on options supported by consistent human trials, whereas those considering research-stage options should recognize when conclusions rely mainly on animal studies or reviews.

Finally, look for consistency across studies, not just a reported improvement. Several options have conflicting findings, so their results may be less predictable across populations or study settings. Where the evidence is limited, inconsistent, or based on small studies, it is difficult to know how reliably the finding would apply to an individual.

Diatelos provides general wellness information based on published research. It is not medical advice. Talk to a clinician before starting any new supplement or practice, especially if you have a health condition, are pregnant, or take medication.