health
HDL Cholesterol Increase
HDL Cholesterol Increase means a higher measured level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. It describes a change in a cholesterol measurement, rather than a symptom that a person necessarily notices or a diagnosis by itself.
HDL Cholesterol Increase describes a health-related effect focused on higher HDL cholesterol.
These are research findings, not promises. Most options have little evidence, and results differ from person to person.
What may help
What studies found for each option, best evidence first.
24 options:3 some evidence12 not enough evidence2 not tested in people7 no benefit found
YogapracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Not known
Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.
All 8 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
A 2025 pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded found higher HDL cholesterol among 13,235 people. Another pooled analysis reported an increase of +0.06 mmol/L.
Open the Yoga pageSwimmingpracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Not known
Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.
All 3 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
A review reported favorable effects of swimming on HDL cholesterol, but a pooled comparison ranked swimming fourth for this outcome and found dance had a better effect.
Open the Swimming pageQigongpracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Large
Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.
All 3 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
A 2023 meta-analysis of randomized trials found higher HDL cholesterol among 486 people in its analysis. A 2021 review also reported higher blood high-density lipoprotein in obese women with diabetes.
Open the Qigong pageHigh-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)practiceNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
21 of 32 studies found a benefit; 11 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
Pooled analyses of randomized trials found small increases in HDL, including 0.04 mmol/L in an analysis of 4,213 people and 0.07 mmol/L in an analysis of 296 people. Findings disagree: a separate pooled analysis involving 1,192 people did not find a statistically significant increase.
Open the High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) pageFastingpracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
7 of 14 studies found a benefit; 7 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
Open the Fasting pageCardiopracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
8 of 11 studies found a benefit; 3 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
A pooled analysis of randomized trials found high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased by 2.4 mg/dL, and another pooled analysis found a greater increase among postmenopausal women. A separate pooled analysis of randomized trials did not find a significant HDL change, so results were mixed.
Open the Cardio pageTai ChipracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
4 of 7 studies found a benefit; 3 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
Open the Tai Chi pageStrength TrainingpracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
2 of 4 studies found a benefit; 2 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
A pooled analysis of randomized trials found HDL cholesterol improved compared with standard treatment among 1,180 people in its outcome analysis. Findings differ by comparison: a pooled analysis in postmenopausal women found aerobic exercise improved HDL-C, while other interventions did not differ significantly in pairwise comparisons.
Open the Strength Training page
The expert view shows every study, dose protocol and source.
What may help
Linked to improving it24 listedStart here
Most likely to help, from the evidence we have
- →PracticesYogaCertaintyMediumSourceRCT8 other sources
A 2025 pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded found higher HDL cholesterol among 13,235 people (MD: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.69 to 3.19). Another pooled analysis reported an increase of +0.06 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.10).
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Diabetes Type2
- Dyslipidemia
- Heart Disease
- Hypertension
- +5 more
Open YogaStudy result
people practicing yoga showed higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.69 to 3.19, I2 = 93%, P < 0.001)
- →PracticesSwimmingCertaintyMediumSourceRCT3 other sources
A review reported favorable effects of swimming on HDL cholesterol, but a pooled comparison ranked swimming fourth for this outcome and found dance had a better effect.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
Open SwimmingStudy result
For HDL cholesterol, dance showed a better effect. Swimming SUCRA for HDL-C was 0.587, ranking 4th.
- →PracticesQigongCertaintyMediumSourceRCTLarge effect3 other sources
A 2023 meta-analysis of randomized trials found higher HDL cholesterol among 486 people in its analysis (SMD = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.06–1.85). A 2021 review also reported higher blood high-density lipoprotein in obese women with diabetes.
How big is the effect
Large effectA big difference on average. Check how strong the evidence is.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Breast Cancer
- Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
- Diabetes
- Fibromyalgia
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Osteoarthritis
Open QigongStudy result
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (SMD = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.06–1.85)
Low probability(14)(1)(13)
- →PracticesCardioCertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisSmall effectconflicting findings11 other sources
A pooled analysis of randomized trials found high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased by 2.4 mg/dL (95% CI: 1.0 to 3.8), and another pooled analysis found a greater increase among postmenopausal women. A separate pooled analysis of randomized trials did not find a significant HDL change, so results were mixed.
How big is the effect
Small effectA small but noticeable difference on average.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Diabetes Type2
- Menopause
- Obesity
- Overweight
- Pcos
Open CardioStudy result
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased by 2.4 mg/dL (95% CI: 1.0 to 3.8)
- →PracticesFastingCertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisTrivial effectconflicting findings14 other sources
A meta-analysis of randomized trials found an HDL increase of WMD: 0.04 mmol/l in 2,032 people, while another pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded reported +0.1 mmol/L. A separate pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded found no significant difference in HDL-C (MD = 0.03 mmol/L; 95% CI, −0.16 to 0.21; p=0.783).
How big is the effect
Trivial effectReal in studies, but too small for most people to notice.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Diabetes
- Fatty Liver Nafld
- Hypertension
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Obesity
- Prediabetes
Open FastingStudy result
IF significantly increased high-density lipoproteins [WMD: 0.04 mmol/l] when compared with CON
- →PracticesHigh-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)CertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisSmall effectconflicting findings32 other sources
Pooled analyses of randomized trials found small increases in HDL, including 0.04 mmol/L in an analysis of 4,213 people and 0.07 mmol/L in an analysis of 296 people. Findings disagree: a separate pooled analysis involving 1,192 people did not find a statistically significant increase.
How big is the effect
Small effectA small but noticeable difference on average.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Asthma
- Cancer
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Diabetes
- Diabetes Type2
- Fatty Liver Nafld
- +10 more
Open High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)Study result
high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels [MD: 0.04 mmol L−1, p = 0.002]
- →PracticesTai ChiCertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisModerate effectconflicting findings7 other sources
A pooled analysis whose study designs were not recorded found higher HDL-C (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI [0.28, 0.79]) among 248 people in its outcome analysis in 2023. Results were mixed: a pooled analysis of randomized trials involving 795 people in its outcome analysis found no statistically significant difference in 2026.
How big is the effect
Moderate effectA clear difference on average.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Breast Cancer
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Diabetes Type2
- Dyslipidemia
- Hyperglycemia
- Hypertension
- +3 more
Open Tai ChiStudy result
while increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD = 0.09, p ...
- →PracticesStrength TrainingCertaintyLowSourceRCTSmall effectconflicting findings4 other sources
A pooled analysis of randomized trials found HDL cholesterol improved compared with standard treatment among 1,180 people in its outcome analysis. Findings differ by comparison: a pooled analysis in postmenopausal women found aerobic exercise improved HDL-C, while other interventions did not differ significantly in pairwise comparisons.
How big is the effect
Small effectA small but noticeable difference on average.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Diabetes Type2
- Menopause
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Overweight
Open Strength TrainingStudy result
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (standardised mean differences (SMD) +0.40 mg/dL, 95% CI 0.07 to -0.72) improved compared with standard treatment. The abstract prints the CI as '0.07 to -0.72', which is internally inconsistent; the reported direction is taken from the stated improvement.
- →PracticesTabata TrainingCertaintyLowSourceRCTLarge effect1 other source
A 2023 randomized trial of 122 healthy participants found higher HDL cholesterol, with a large effect (d = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.42).
How big is the effect
Large effectA big difference on average. Check how strong the evidence is.
Who was studied
- Healthy people
Open Tabata TrainingStudy result
high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (p < 0.001, d = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.65 to 1.42)
- →PracticesBrisk WalkingCertaintyLowSourceClinical4 other sources
A 2022 trial found HDL-C improved across walking conditions, and the effect remained after the 12-week retention period. A 2013 quasi-experimental study also found serum HDL-cholesterol increased within the walking group.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Diabetes Type2
- Menopause
Open Brisk WalkingStudy result
All walking conditions improved high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ... (all P < 0.001); however, after the 12-week retention period only the training effects of HDL-C (P < 0.05) ... remained robust.
- →PracticesFinnish SaunaCertaintyLowSourceClinical4 other sources
Two quasi-experimental studies reported increases in HDL cholesterol after repeated sauna baths, including a 23.6% increase in a study of 12 people. Findings differ: a 2014 study of 16 people found that HDL remained only slightly increased after the 10th session, without statistical significance.
Who was studied
- Healthy people
Open Finnish SaunaStudy result
concentration of HDLC increased after 7th sauna bath in group I.
- →PracticesHatha YogaCertaintyLowSourceClinicalconflicting findings6 other sources
A randomized trial of 38 people found HDL-cholesterol did not decrease in the yoga group, while a small quasi-experimental study reported HDL-C increased after training. Results conflict: a randomized trial of 231 people found no significant difference in HDL.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Chronic Kidney Disease
- Diabetes Type2
Open Hatha YogaStudy result
The concentration of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol was decreased in the diet group significantly but not in yoga (P = 0.006).
- →PracticesMeditationCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
Increases of HDL-c concentration in mindfulness but not controls conditions (7; 2, 10 mg/mL vs. −1; −2, 3 mg/mL; p = 0.024)... Decreases in serum ghrelin (−0.71 ± 0.37 vs. 0.83 ± 0.75 pg/mL; p = 0.026) and cortisol (−1.42 ± 0.94 vs. 2.26 ± 0.93 µg/dL; p = 0.015)
Open MeditationWho was studied
- People with a condition
- →PracticesMindfulness MeditationCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
A quasi-experimental study in 74 healthy participants reported HDL levels of 63 ± 13 vs. 69 ± 14 mg/dL.
Who was studied
- Healthy people
Open Mindfulness MeditationStudy result
significant variations in HDL (63 ± 13 vs. 69 ± 14 mg/dL, p = 0.048)
- →PracticesLaughter Yoga / TherapyCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
A 2026 quasi-experimental study of 64 healthy participants reported increased high-density lipoprotein levels.
Who was studied
- Healthy people
Open Laughter Yoga / TherapyStudy result
High-density lipoprotein levels were significantly increased (P = 0.027)
- →SupplementsChagaCertaintyLowSourceAnimal researchanimal / in-vitro only2 other sources
In animal models, HDL was 0.77 ± 0.22 mmol/L with IOPH versus 0.35 ± 0.09 mmol/L in the model, while HIOP produced a 49.2% increase versus HFD (2.76 ± 0.37 vs 1.85 ± 0.14 mmol/L).
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Dyslipidemia
- Kidney Disease
Dose & course
8 weeks
Who it applies to
- Animal
Open ChagaStudy result
HDL-C significantly higher than MG (p<0.05); no numeric values reported
- →PracticesCyclingCertaintyLowSourceTheoretical1 other source
A proposed effect of sustained aerobic training is a modest rise in HDL cholesterol alongside lower triglycerides, with larger effects at higher weekly volume.
Open CyclingStudy result
Sustained aerobic training modestly raises HDL cholesterol and lowers triglycerides, with larger effects at higher weekly volume.
Very low probability(7)(0)(7)
- →PracticesRed Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)CertaintyVery lowSourceRCT1 other source
No human evidence is reported for an increase in HDL cholesterol; the cited research concerns people with obesity.
Open Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Obesity
- →PracticesDanceCertaintyVery lowSourceRCT1 other source
A pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded reported conflicting statistical details for HDL-C in people with Hypertension (High Blood Pressure): its abstract gave MD = 0.20, 95% CI (−0.02, 0.42), p < 0.0001, while Table 2 gave p = 0.08 and a confidence interval crossing zero. This finding does not clearly support an increase.
Open DanceWho was studied
- People with a condition
- →PracticesPilatesCertaintyVery lowSourceRCT1 other source
There is no human evidence for an increase in HDL cholesterol from Pilates.
Open PilatesWho was studied
- People with a condition
- Diabetes
- Obesity
- →PracticesCupping TherapyCertaintyVery lowSourceRCT1 other source
Human study findings do not establish that Cupping Therapy increases HDL cholesterol.
Open Cupping TherapyWho was studied
- People with a condition
- Metabolic Syndrome
- →PracticesCalisthenicsCertaintyVery lowSourceRCT2 other sources
An RCT in 60 people with obesity found no significant group-by-time interaction for HDL, so the studies did not support an increase.
Open CalisthenicsWho was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Obesity
- →PracticesJump Rope TrainingCertaintyVery lowSourceRCT1 other source
Studies did not support an increase in HDL-C: an RCT of 129 participants with obesity reported a change of MD -0.01 mmol/L.
Open Jump Rope TrainingWho was studied
- People with a condition
- Obesity
Practices compared
Practices with at least one trial of their own for this goal. Ranked by how sure the evidence is, then effect size.Top 10 of 14| Practice | How sure | Effect size | Own trials | What worked in trials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qigong | CertaintyMediumSourceRCT | Large effect | 3 trials or pooled analyses | 60 min · 3–3.5×/week · 12–14 weeks |
| Yoga | CertaintyMediumSourceRCT | 8 trials or pooled analyses | 30–45 min · 3–3.5×/week · 1.4–13 weeks | |
| Swimming | CertaintyMediumSourceRCT | 2 trials or pooled analyses | ||
| Tabata Training | CertaintyLowSourceRCT | Large effect | 1 trial or pooled analysis | |
| Tai Chi | CertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysis | Moderate effect | 4 trials or pooled analyses | 60 min · 3×/week · 12–29 weeks |
| High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) | CertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysis | Small effect | 19 trials or pooled analyses | 16–28 min · 2–3×/week · 2–12 weeks |
| Cardio | CertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysis | Small effect | 7 trials or pooled analyses | 1.1–3.5×/week · 2–16 weeks |
| Strength Training | CertaintyLowSourceRCT | Small effect | 2 trials or pooled analyses | |
| Fasting | CertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysis | Trivial effect | 7 trials or pooled analyses | 7×/week · 4–26 weeks |
| Brisk Walking | CertaintyLowSourceClinical | 3 trials or pooled analyses |
What worked in trials: From the smallest to the typical amount in the trials that found this benefit. Not the most anyone did, not a target and not a limit.
How to read the evidence
Evidence tier — overall strength of the evidence for the whole compound
- StrongWell established — backed by strong, consistent human research.
- ModerateSome genuine support, but mostly from small or lower-quality studies. Promising, not proven.
- PreliminaryEarly-stage evidence — a promising hypothesis, not an established effect yet.
- LimitedVery limited evidence — treat this as a hypothesis, not proof.
- InsufficientNot enough good evidence to draw conclusions yet.
Certainty — how sure we can be that the effect is real
- Very highVery sure — strong, consistent evidence
- HighFairly sure — consistent evidence from good studies
- MediumModerately sure — new studies could change this
- LowNot sure — little or mixed evidence
- Very lowVery unsure — almost no usable evidence
Source — where the data comes from
- Meta-analysisPooled analysis of many trials — the strongest evidence
- RCTRandomized controlled trial — a strong human study design
- ClinicalA human clinical study
- Reference knowledgeFrom general health-science or pharmacology references, not a study of this exact claim
- Animal researchStudied in animals, not humans
- Community reportsAggregated user reports — anecdotal signal, not evidence
- TheoreticalMechanism-based reasoning, not yet tested
Study grade — quality of each underlying study (A best, D weakest)
- AHigh-quality — strong, consistent human trials
- BGood — solid evidence with some limitations
- CModerate — limited, small, or mixed-quality studies
- DWeak — preliminary, indirect, or animal-only
Confidence — how strongly the sources back a finding
A 0–100 score from study quality and agreement
Most supplement evidence is graded C–D. Read it as preliminary signal, not proof.
Full write-up
What is it
HDL Cholesterol Increase means a higher measured level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood. It describes a change in a cholesterol measurement, rather than a symptom that a person necessarily notices or a diagnosis by itself. This outcome should not be confused with a general increase in all types of cholesterol.
How interventions help
Interventions associated with higher HDL cholesterol include movement practices such as Yoga, Tai Chi, and Swimming, as well as several supplements. These approaches are not interchangeable: the movement-based findings come from activity programs, while supplement findings were observed with specific products and study regimens. The evidence includes people with clinical conditions as well as groups whose health status was not specified, so the results may not apply equally to everyone.
Changes generally appeared over weeks rather than immediately. For example, Melatonin was studied at 3-10 mg/day for 6-12 weeks, Spirulina at 1-6 g/day for 6-12 weeks, and Astaxanthin at 6-12 mg/day for 8-24 weeks. Other interventions were followed for longer or across a much wider range of durations, including Garlic from 3 weeks to 1 year and Milk Thistle (Silymarin) from 45 days to 2 years. These time frames describe how long participants used an intervention before HDL cholesterol was assessed; they do not establish a universal schedule or dose.
The size and consistency of change also differ. Some findings describe a small increase, while others report larger or more moderate changes. Garlic has conflicting evidence, and Omega-3 and Tai Chi also have conflicting findings, meaning results have not been uniform across studies. For Omega-3, the studies covered mixed health conditions and a median trial duration of 13 weeks. The observed outcome is an increase in HDL cholesterol, but the evidence does not establish that every intervention will produce the same change or that an increase alone translates into a broader health benefit.
Choosing guidance
Choosing among these options depends on more than the reported direction of change. First consider whether the evidence comes from human studies, particularly randomized controlled trials, or from animal studies, reviews, or reference material. Human findings are more directly relevant to people, while animal and review-based entries are better viewed as preliminary rather than as evidence of a comparable effect in humans.
The time and amount studied also vary substantially. Some interventions were evaluated over several weeks, while others were followed for months or longer, and supplement doses range from small amounts to relatively high daily amounts. This makes direct comparisons difficult: an option studied for a short period may not answer the same question as one assessed after sustained use. The table and individual entries provide the specific study conditions to check before drawing comparisons.
Applicability matters as well. Evidence drawn from clinical conditions or mixed health groups may not translate equally to someone without those characteristics. People prioritizing direct human evidence may focus on options supported by consistent human trials, whereas those considering research-stage options should recognize when conclusions rely mainly on animal studies or reviews.
Finally, look for consistency across studies, not just a reported improvement. Several options have conflicting findings, so their results may be less predictable across populations or study settings. Where the evidence is limited, inconsistent, or based on small studies, it is difficult to know how reliably the finding would apply to an individual.