body
Grip Strength Improvement
Grip Strength Improvement is a body effect describing an increase in the force produced when a person squeezes with the hand. It is a specific physical measurement, commonly expressed in kilograms, rather than a general claim about overall strength, endurance, muscle size, or exercise performance.
Grip Strength Improvement is categorized as a body effect. Explore the surrounding information for a focused view of this outcome.
These are research findings, not promises. Most options have little evidence, and results differ from person to person.
What may help
What studies found for each option, best evidence first.
18 options:3 some evidence2 mixed11 not enough evidence1 not tested in people1 no benefit found
Strength TrainingpracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Not known
Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.
All 4 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
Open the Strength Training pageHatha YogapracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Not known
Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.
All 5 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.
A review of studies whose designs were not recorded found grip strength improved in two studies but not in one. A randomized trial of 30 people also found increased handgrip strength in both yoga groups compared with the other groups.
Open the Hatha Yoga pageVinyasa YogapracticeSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Small
Some human studies found a benefit. More research could change this.
All 2 studies with a clear result found a benefit. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.
In a 12-week randomized trial, 18 people in the yoga group improved their handgrip strength from 41.2 (8.70) to 44.9 (8.06) kg; the reported effect size was small.
Open the Vinyasa Yoga pageRed Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)practiceMixed resultsSize of effect: Not known
Studies disagree: some found a benefit, others found none. Do not count on it.
2 of 3 studies found a benefit; 1 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
Open the Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation) pagePilatespracticeMixed resultsSize of effect: Very small
Studies disagree: some found a benefit, others found none. Do not count on it.
7 of 8 studies found a benefit; 1 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
One trial found handgrip strength increased by 1.76 kg among 104 people. Findings conflict: a pooled analysis of randomized and non-randomized human studies found no statistically significant effect among 163 people.
Open the Pilates pageQigongpracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
1 of 4 studies found a benefit; 3 found none. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
A 2025 meta-analysis of randomized trials reported improved grip strength with Fitness Qigong among 1,029 people, including older adults and people with sarcopenia.
Open the Qigong pageYogapracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
1 of 2 studies found a benefit; 1 found none. Strongest study: a systematic review of studies.
A review of studies involving people with conditions including back pain and rheumatoid arthritis reported increased hand grip strength compared with no intervention. The size of the increase was not stated in the finding.
Open the Yoga pageAcupuncturepracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
The one study found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
A pooled analysis of randomized trials in people with Sarcopenia (Muscle Loss) reported improved grip strength.
Open the Acupuncture page
Comparing practices
- Hatha YogaSome evidence it helps5 trials
- Vinyasa YogaSome evidence it helpsSize of effect: Small2 trials
- PilatesMixed resultsSize of effect: Very small7 trials
The expert view shows every study, dose protocol and source.
What may help
Linked to improving it18 listedStart here
Most likely to help, from the evidence we have
- →PracticesStrength TrainingCertaintyMediumSourceMeta-analysis4 other sources
A pooled analysis whose study designs were not recorded found improved grip strength among 1,302 people in its outcome analysis (ES = 0.55, 95% CI [0.34, 0.76]). A separate analysis reported only a small increase in manual grip strength after more than 6 weeks, with uncertain evidence.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
Open Strength TrainingStudy result
A meta-analysis of 19 studies evaluated the effects of RT on GS, revealing a significant improvement (ES = 0.55, 95% CI [0.34, 0.76], p < 0.01)
- →PracticesRed Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)CertaintyMediumSourceRCT3 other sources
Pooled randomized trials reported improved grip strength: one analysis favored low-level laser therapy over placebo, and another found a difference of MD 5.03 kg [4.29, 5.78] at 4 weeks among 95 people. The findings came from studies involving people with Parkinson’s Disease and Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Parkinsons Disease
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
Open Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)Study result
The pooled mean difference (MD) showed a significant improvement in grip strength favoring LLLT over placebo, with an MD of -12.38 (95% CI: [-17.42, -7.34], z = -4.82, p < 0.01).
- →PracticesPilatesCertaintyMediumSourceRCTTrivial effectconflicting findings8 other sources
One trial found handgrip strength increased by 1.76 kg among 104 people. Findings conflict: a pooled analysis of randomized and non-randomized human studies found no statistically significant effect among 163 people.
How big is the effect
Trivial effectReal in studies, but too small for most people to notice.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Breast Cancer
- Diabetes Type2
- Gestational Diabetes
- Hypertension
- Menopause
- Obesity
- +1 more
Open PilatesStudy result
After 8 weeks of Pilates intervention, the Pilates group demonstrated significantly greater grip strength, improved hamstring flexibility, and reduced spinal curvature compared to the control group (P < 0.05)
- →PracticesHatha YogaCertaintyMediumSourceClinical5 other sources
A review of studies whose designs were not recorded found grip strength improved in two studies but not in one. A randomized trial of 30 people also found increased handgrip strength in both yoga groups compared with the other groups.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Breast Cancer
- Overweight
Open Hatha YogaStudy result
Grip strength improved significantly in two studies (MD 3.56, P<0.01; MD 3.58, P=0.01) but not in one (P=0.26).
- →PracticesVinyasa YogaCertaintyMediumSourceClinicalSmall effect2 other sources
In a 12-week randomized trial, 18 people in the yoga group improved their handgrip strength from 41.2 (8.70) to 44.9 (8.06) kg; the reported effect size was small.
How big is the effect
Small effectA small but noticeable difference on average.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
Open Vinyasa YogaStudy result
Wilcoxon signed rank test results show a significant difference in the intervention group (W=0.00, p=0.006) for handgrip strength comparing baseline values with the post 12-week yoga intervention values; yoga group improved from 41.2 (8.70) to 44.9 (8.06) kg; Cohen's d=0.445 (95% CI 0.213, 0.757), p
Low probability(12)
- →PracticesQigongCertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysisTrivial effect4 other sources
A 2025 meta-analysis of randomized trials reported improved grip strength with Fitness Qigong among 1,029 people, including older adults and people with sarcopenia.
How big is the effect
Trivial effectReal in studies, but too small for most people to notice.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Elderly
- Sarcopenia
Open QigongStudy result
Fitness Qigong significantly improved grip strength (MD = 2.39, 95 % CI [1.42, 3.36], P ... (abstract truncated)
- →PracticesYogaCertaintyLowSourceRCT2 other sources
A review of studies involving people with conditions including back pain and rheumatoid arthritis reported increased hand grip strength compared with no intervention. The size of the increase was not stated in the finding.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Back Pain
- Carpal Tunnel
- Frozen Shoulder
- Herniated Disc
- Neck Pain
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- +1 more
Open YogaStudy result
Yoga provided significant increase in hand grip strength (Kg) (P<.002) and a significant reduction in self-reported drug score (NSAIDs/day) (P<.013) in comparison with no intervention control group (Dash & Telles 2001). Hatha yoga caused self-reported pain reduction (P<.05) and significantly improve
- →PracticesAcupunctureCertaintyLowSourceRCTModerate effect1 other source
A pooled analysis of randomized trials in people with Sarcopenia (Muscle Loss) reported improved grip strength (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49–0.83).
How big is the effect
Moderate effectA clear difference on average.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Sarcopenia
Open AcupunctureStudy result
grip strength (SMD = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.49–0.83)
- →PracticesHeating Pads / Warm CompressesCertaintyLowSourceRCTSmall effect1 other source
A pooled analysis of randomized trials in people with osteoarthritis found improved grip strength (SMD = 0.43, p = 0.01; effect SMD 0.43 [0.1, 0.76]).
How big is the effect
Small effectA small but noticeable difference on average.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Osteoarthritis
Open Heating Pads / Warm CompressesStudy result
improved grip strength (SMD = 0.43, p = 0.01)
- →PracticesHigh-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)CertaintyLowSourceClinicalTrivial effectconflicting findings6 other sources
In a trial of 61 people, the HIIT group had a within-group handgrip-strength improvement of +10.1%. Another trial found less decline on the affected side with HIIT than with control, while a pooled analysis involving 176 people did not find a statistically significant effect.
How big is the effect
Trivial effectReal in studies, but too small for most people to notice.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Breast Cancer
- Copd
- Obesity
- Sarcopenia
Open High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)Study result
The individual HIIT group showed within-group improvements in ... handgrip strength (+10.1%, p = 0.003)
- →PracticesCyclingCertaintyLowSourceClinical2 other sources
A randomized trial involving 20 people with dementia found grip strength increased significantly only in the seated cycling group.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Dementia
Open CyclingStudy result
Grip strength increased significantly only in the seated cycling group (p-values not legible in abstract).
- →PracticesTai ChiCertaintyLowSourceClinicalconflicting findings3 other sources
A 2023 trial of 80 people found higher grip strength in the experimental group than in the control group. However, a pooled analysis whose study designs were not recorded found no significant improvement in handgrip strength among 351 people.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
Open Tai ChiStudy result
After intervention, the strength (F_(1,78)=23.395, p<0.001, eta_p^2=0.231) of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of control group; strength was measured by grip strength (kg).
- →PracticesLatin Dance FitnessCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
A 2020 trial of 98 healthy participants reported a handgrip-test result of 0.274 ± 0.08 for the ET group and 0.352 ± 0.08 for the CnT group.
Who was studied
- Healthy people
Open Latin Dance FitnessStudy result
handgrip test: 0.274 ± 0.08, p < 0.001, CnT = 0.352 ± 0.08, p < 0.001
- →PracticesMassageCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
In a trial of 30 people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, median handgrip strength in the intervention group increased from 55 (40-75) to 65 (45-80) kg at the end of treatment compared with baseline.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
Open MassageStudy result
In the intervention group, a statistically significant increase in handgrip strength was observed at the end of treatment (T2) compared with baseline (p = 0.008); median increased from 55 (40-75) to 65 (45-80) kg.
- →PracticesTENS / EMS TherapyCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
In one randomized trial of 28 healthy participants, the daily electrical stimulation group had a greater increase in left-hand grip strength than the group that did not receive electrical stimulation (p = 0.007).
Who was studied
- Healthy people
Open TENS / EMS TherapyStudy result
the daily EMS group had a significantly greater increase in left-hand grip strength (p = 0.007) compared to the no EMS group
- →PracticesBrisk WalkingCertaintyLowSourceClinicalconflicting findings2 other sources
A 2023 trial in healthy people found handgrip strength increased by 3.1 kg. The results differ across studies: a 2017 trial found a 4.14% difference in grip-strength variation that was not statistically significant.
Who was studied
- Healthy people
Open Brisk WalkingStudy result
handgrip strength (mean difference: +3.1 kg; g = 0.89)
- →PracticesGardening TherapyCertaintyLowSourceTheoretical1 other source
Digging, weeding, and pruning are proposed to support hand grip strength and dexterity.
Open Gardening TherapyStudy result
Gardening activities such as digging, weeding, and pruning improve hand grip strength and dexterity.
Very low probability(1)
- →PracticesCalisthenicsCertaintyVery lowSourceTheoretical4 other sources
A 2023 randomized trial of 69 found no significant change in handgrip strength, so the trial did not support this effect.
Open CalisthenicsWho was studied
- People with a condition
- Overweight
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
Practices compared
Practices with at least one trial of their own for this goal. Ranked by how sure the evidence is, then effect size.Top 10 of 14| Practice | How sure | Effect size | Own trials | What worked in trials |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinyasa Yoga | CertaintyMediumSourceClinical | Small effect | 2 trials or pooled analyses | 12 weeks |
| Pilates | CertaintyMediumSourceRCT | Trivial effect | 7 trials or pooled analyses | 50–55 min · 2–3×/week · 8–12 weeks |
| Hatha Yoga | CertaintyMediumSourceClinical | 5 trials or pooled analyses | 60 min · 2×/week · 8–12 weeks | |
| Strength Training | CertaintyMediumSourceMeta-analysis | 4 trials or pooled analyses | 2–2.2×/week · 8–13 weeks | |
| Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation) | CertaintyMediumSourceRCT | 2 trials or pooled analyses | ||
| Acupuncture | CertaintyLowSourceRCT | Moderate effect | 1 trial or pooled analysis | |
| Heating Pads / Warm Compresses | CertaintyLowSourceRCT | Small effect | 1 trial or pooled analysis | |
| High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) | CertaintyLowSourceClinical | Trivial effect | 3 trials or pooled analyses | 8–9 min · 2×/week · 10–12 weeks |
| Qigong | CertaintyLowSourceMeta-analysis | Trivial effect | 1 trial or pooled analysis | |
| Cycling | CertaintyLowSourceClinical | 1 trial or pooled analysis |
What worked in trials: From the smallest to the typical amount in the trials that found this benefit. Not the most anyone did, not a target and not a limit.
How to read the evidence
Evidence tier — overall strength of the evidence for the whole compound
- StrongWell established — backed by strong, consistent human research.
- ModerateSome genuine support, but mostly from small or lower-quality studies. Promising, not proven.
- PreliminaryEarly-stage evidence — a promising hypothesis, not an established effect yet.
- LimitedVery limited evidence — treat this as a hypothesis, not proof.
- InsufficientNot enough good evidence to draw conclusions yet.
Certainty — how sure we can be that the effect is real
- Very highVery sure — strong, consistent evidence
- HighFairly sure — consistent evidence from good studies
- MediumModerately sure — new studies could change this
- LowNot sure — little or mixed evidence
- Very lowVery unsure — almost no usable evidence
Source — where the data comes from
- Meta-analysisPooled analysis of many trials — the strongest evidence
- RCTRandomized controlled trial — a strong human study design
- ClinicalA human clinical study
- Reference knowledgeFrom general health-science or pharmacology references, not a study of this exact claim
- Animal researchStudied in animals, not humans
- Community reportsAggregated user reports — anecdotal signal, not evidence
- TheoreticalMechanism-based reasoning, not yet tested
Study grade — quality of each underlying study (A best, D weakest)
- AHigh-quality — strong, consistent human trials
- BGood — solid evidence with some limitations
- CModerate — limited, small, or mixed-quality studies
- DWeak — preliminary, indirect, or animal-only
Confidence — how strongly the sources back a finding
A 0–100 score from study quality and agreement
Most supplement evidence is graded C–D. Read it as preliminary signal, not proof.
Full write-up
What is it
Grip Strength Improvement is a body effect describing an increase in the force produced when a person squeezes with the hand. It is a specific physical measurement, commonly expressed in kilograms, rather than a general claim about overall strength, endurance, muscle size, or exercise performance. Results may reflect either a short-term change or a change after a longer intervention, depending on when grip strength is assessed.
How interventions help
Interventions associated with improved grip strength fall into several practical patterns. Caffeine was studied as an acute pre-exercise intervention, with an immediate onset and no requirement for daily use. This differs from approaches intended to produce change over weeks or months, such as Whey Protein at 20 g/day for 3 months, Krill Oil at 4 g/day for 6 months, and Collagen at 15 g/day for 12 weeks.
Movement-based approaches also differ from nutritional interventions. Tai Chi and yoga practices were evaluated over structured interventions, with Tai Chi studied in mixed health-status groups, Hatha Yoga in people with a clinical condition, and Yoga in healthy participants. These populations are not interchangeable, so results from one practice or group should not automatically be generalized to another.
Some findings suggest that continuity may matter. Glycine was taken daily for 24 weeks; grip strength increased from 24.5 to 27.2 kg, and the reported effect persisted for weeks after stopping. Maca Root was studied at 5000 mg/day (2500 mg twice daily) for 8 weeks, while Shilajit was studied at 500 mg/day for 28 days, illustrating that studied schedules range from several weeks to months.
The evidence does not establish one shared mechanism for all of these interventions. Applicability is also limited for findings that were not based on human evidence, including Acetyl-L-Carnitine (ALCAR), which was studied in null mice rather than people.
Choosing guidance
For a short-term, session-linked approach, Caffeine is the option studied with acute pre-exercise administration and an immediate onset. It may suit someone seeking an effect around a particular exercise session rather than a daily regimen. Tai Chi and the yoga-based options are better viewed as ongoing practices, with evidence drawn from human intervention studies in different populations. Hatha Yoga was studied in people with a clinical condition, while Yoga was studied in healthy participants, so those findings may not apply equally to every reader.
Whey Protein, Krill Oil, Citrulline, Collagen, Magnesium, Vitamin K2, Maca Root, Shilajit, and Glycine were examined over periods ranging from weeks to months. These options suit readers willing to follow a sustained plan rather than expecting an immediate change. Glycine specifically involved daily use, whereas the available information does not establish that every longer-term option requires daily use. Meditation may be relevant when grip strength is considered alongside broader performance outcomes rather than as an isolated target.
The human applicability of the evidence should guide interpretation. Caffeine, Tai Chi, Whey Protein, Krill Oil, Hatha Yoga, Vitamin K2, Yoga, Meditation, Maca Root, and Shilajit have human evidence flagged, while Acetyl-L-Carnitine (ALCAR), Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma), and Valerian Root are supported by animal research only. Several other entries are based on limited or indirect evidence, so they are less suitable for firm conclusions about people. No listed option is flagged for conflicting evidence, but some findings are based on small studies, brief interventions, or comparisons that do not show a clear between-group difference.