body
Appetite Increase (Desired)
Appetite Increase (Desired) means a greater desire or readiness to eat. A person may notice stronger hunger, more interest in food, or less difficulty starting a meal.
Appetite Increase (Desired) is listed as a body-related effect, offering a focused starting point for further reference.
These are research findings, not promises. Most options have little evidence, and results differ from person to person.
What may help
None of these options has good evidence yet. Best evidence first.
8 options:6 not enough evidence1 personal stories only1 no benefit found
MassagepracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
The one study found a benefit. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
In children with FD, a pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded found lower early-satiety scores with combination therapy than with conventional therapy; 442 people were included in the analysis. This finding concerns early satiety, rather than appetite measured directly.
Open the Massage pageBreathworkpracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
The one study found a benefit. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.
In a randomized trial involving 76 people with Breast Cancer, lack-of-appetite scores were lower in the intervention group than in the control group. This finding reflects reduced reported lack of appetite, not a measured increase in appetite.
Open the Breathwork pageCupping TherapypracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
The one study found a benefit. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.
In a trial of 60 people with COVID-19, anorexia was alleviated more in the galbanum group than in the control group.
Open the Cupping Therapy pageLaughter Yoga / TherapypracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
The one study found a benefit. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.
In a randomized trial involving 60 people with leukemia or lymphoma, nausea and loss-of-appetite symptoms were alleviated in the intervention group.
Open the Laughter Yoga / Therapy pageNasal Irrigation (Neti Pot)practiceNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
The one study found a benefit. Strongest study: a study that followed people over time.
A cohort study of 144 people with the common cold reported different degrees of improvement in appetite symptom scores between two groups.
Open the Nasal Irrigation (Neti Pot) pageGrounding / EarthingpracticeNot enough evidence
Too few or too small studies to know if it works.
The one study found a benefit. Strongest study: a study that followed people over time.
A 2023 cohort report in people with COVID-19 listed anorexia among symptoms that improved after earthing; this finding does not establish a general appetite-increasing effect.
Open the Grounding / Earthing pageFastingpracticeOnly personal stories
Jump Rope TrainingpracticeNo benefit found
Studies looked for a benefit and did not find one.
The one study found no benefit. Strongest study: a non-randomized trial.
The tested effect was not supported as a general response: in a quasi-experimental study of 26 participants, appetite in females increased from 13 mm immediately after exercise to 30 mm 30 min after exercise, while it remained unchanged in males.
Open the Jump Rope Training page
The expert view shows every study, dose protocol and source.
What may help
Linked to improving it8 listedStart here
The best we have, but the evidence is still weak
- →PracticesMassageCertaintyLowSourceRCT1 other source
In children with FD, a pooled analysis whose designs were not recorded found lower early-satiety scores with combination therapy than with conventional therapy (MD = -0.18; 95% CI -0.31 to -0.06, I² = 0%, P = 0.004); 442 people were included in the analysis. This finding concerns early satiety, rather than appetite measured directly.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
Open MassageStudy result
Compared with conventional therapy, combination therapy significantly decreased the score of early satiety in children with FD (MD = -0.18; 95% CI -0.31 to -0.06, I² = 0%, P = 0.004)
- →PracticesBreathworkCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
In a randomized trial involving 76 people with Breast Cancer, lack-of-appetite scores were lower in the intervention group than in the control group. This finding reflects reduced reported lack of appetite, not a measured increase in appetite.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Breast Cancer
Open BreathworkStudy result
the mean scores of pain, distress (upset), lack of appetite, drowsiness, sadness, general activity, mood, work, relationship with others, walking, and enjoyment of life at all measurement times were significantly lower in the intervention group (MDASI lack of appetite item)
- →PracticesCupping TherapyCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
In a trial of 60 people with COVID-19, anorexia was alleviated more in the galbanum group than in the control group.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Covid 19
Open Cupping TherapyStudy result
Anorexia alleviated in the galbanum group more than the control (p=0.04)
- →PracticesLaughter Yoga / TherapyCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
In a randomized trial involving 60 people with leukemia or lymphoma, nausea and loss-of-appetite symptoms were alleviated in the intervention group (p=0.000 for within-group change).
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Leukemia
- Lymphoma
Open Laughter Yoga / TherapyStudy result
nausea/loss of appetite symptoms were alleviated in the intervention group (p=0.000 for within-group change)
- →PracticesNasal Irrigation (Neti Pot)CertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
A cohort study of 144 people with the common cold reported different degrees of improvement in appetite symptom scores between two groups (P<0.01).
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Common Cold
Open Nasal Irrigation (Neti Pot)Study result
the 2 groups showed markedly different degrees of patient symptom score improvement in sleep quality and appetite (both P<0.01)
- →PracticesGrounding / EarthingCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
A 2023 cohort report in people with COVID-19 listed anorexia among symptoms that improved after earthing; this finding does not establish a general appetite-increasing effect.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
- Covid 19
Open Grounding / EarthingStudy result
The following symptoms were improved after implementing earthing: fever, dyspnea, cough, weakness, headache, chest pain, taste and smell sensation loss, anorexia, and body pain.
Very low probability(2)
- →PracticesJump Rope TrainingCertaintyVery lowSourceClinical1 other source
The tested effect was not supported as a general response: in a quasi-experimental study of 26 participants, appetite in females increased from 13 mm immediately after exercise to 30 mm 30 min after exercise, while it remained unchanged in males.
Open Jump Rope TrainingWho was studied
- Healthy people
Practices compared
Practices with at least one trial of their own for this goal. Ranked by how sure the evidence is, then effect size.| Practice | How sure | Effect size | Own trials |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breathwork | CertaintyLowSourceClinical | 1 trial or pooled analysis | |
| Cupping Therapy | CertaintyLowSourceClinical | 1 trial or pooled analysis | |
| Laughter Yoga / Therapy | CertaintyLowSourceClinical | 1 trial or pooled analysis | |
| Massage | CertaintyLowSourceRCT | 1 trial or pooled analysis |
How to read the evidence
Evidence tier — overall strength of the evidence for the whole compound
- StrongWell established — backed by strong, consistent human research.
- ModerateSome genuine support, but mostly from small or lower-quality studies. Promising, not proven.
- PreliminaryEarly-stage evidence — a promising hypothesis, not an established effect yet.
- LimitedVery limited evidence — treat this as a hypothesis, not proof.
- InsufficientNot enough good evidence to draw conclusions yet.
Certainty — how sure we can be that the effect is real
- Very highVery sure — strong, consistent evidence
- HighFairly sure — consistent evidence from good studies
- MediumModerately sure — new studies could change this
- LowNot sure — little or mixed evidence
- Very lowVery unsure — almost no usable evidence
Source — where the data comes from
- Meta-analysisPooled analysis of many trials — the strongest evidence
- RCTRandomized controlled trial — a strong human study design
- ClinicalA human clinical study
- Reference knowledgeFrom general health-science or pharmacology references, not a study of this exact claim
- Animal researchStudied in animals, not humans
- Community reportsAggregated user reports — anecdotal signal, not evidence
- TheoreticalMechanism-based reasoning, not yet tested
Study grade — quality of each underlying study (A best, D weakest)
- AHigh-quality — strong, consistent human trials
- BGood — solid evidence with some limitations
- CModerate — limited, small, or mixed-quality studies
- DWeak — preliminary, indirect, or animal-only
Confidence — how strongly the sources back a finding
A 0–100 score from study quality and agreement
Most supplement evidence is graded C–D. Read it as preliminary signal, not proof.
Full write-up
What is it
Appetite Increase (Desired) means a greater desire or readiness to eat. A person may notice stronger hunger, more interest in food, or less difficulty starting a meal. It describes appetite itself, not necessarily the amount eaten or a change in body weight. Interventions studied in relation to this outcome include Whey Protein, Black Seed Oil, Reishi, and L-Leucine.
How interventions help
Interventions linked with appetite changes differ substantially in timing and practical context. Some were evaluated as single, short-term exposures: Whey Protein and L-Leucine were assessed immediately after intake, with findings that did not consistently indicate increased appetite. Whey Protein was associated with lower energy intake than the carbohydrate comparison, while L-Leucine-containing preparations produced higher intake than control after accounting for supplement energy. These results describe an acute meal response rather than a sustained change in appetite.
Other approaches were used continuously over several weeks. Black Seed Oil was studied for 8 weeks, Reishi for 4 weeks, and Curcumin for 6 weeks. The reported findings differed: Reishi showed improvement compared with control, whereas Curcumin was associated with small reductions in prospective food intake and related measures that were not significant after multiple testing. Chamomile was taken daily for 30 days in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing chemotherapy, where an extract syrup was reported to improve appetite. This population and treatment setting limit how broadly that finding can be applied.
The remaining findings are less directly applicable to people. BCAA results came from animal studies and were mixed, with supplementation restoring intake in one dietary model but lower-BCAA diets associated with reduced food intake in another analysis. CBD is supported by a theoretical finding, while Glucosamine, Milk Thistle (Silymarin), and Vitamin B1 (Thiamine) are based on reports rather than controlled appetite studies. Iron was associated with increased snack energy intake and self-reported appetite in a review, but the broader relevance depends on the population studied.
Choosing guidance
Choosing among these options depends first on how closely the available evidence matches the intended use. Whey Protein, Reishi, and Chamomile have human evidence flagged, but they were studied in different settings, so results should not be treated as interchangeable. In particular, the Chamomile evidence comes from children undergoing chemotherapy, which limits how directly it applies to other groups. The populations for the other options are not specified, making personal applicability uncertain.
The timing also differs. Some options were assessed after a single or acute exposure, while others were used repeatedly over several weeks or months. A short-term option may be more relevant when the question is whether appetite changes soon after use; longer studies are more relevant when considering a sustained pattern, but they also make it harder to separate the option’s effect from changes occurring over time.
BCAA deserves extra caution because it appears in entries pointing in opposite directions, and its evidence is from animal research rather than humans. Curcumin likewise should not be selected solely because it has a human trial: the reported changes did not remain significant after multiple testing. Options supported mainly by anecdotal reports or theoretical reasoning are best viewed as exploratory rather than as choices with established applicability. Overall, the most suitable option depends on whether human relevance, short-term timing, or evidence from longer repeated use matters most.