health
Constipation
Adverse effectConstipation is a health condition and an adverse outcome. Here, it refers to constipation occurring in association with interventions such as Sodium Bicarbonate, Calcium, Vitamin B9 (Folate), or Berberine.
A straightforward starting point for understanding constipation and its health context.
These are research findings, not promises. Most options have little evidence, and results differ from person to person.
What can cause it
How likely each one is to cause it, most likely first.
FastingpracticeUnclear
Based on 4 studies. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
Pooled analyses whose designs were not recorded reported constipation in fasting studies, including analyses involving people with Diabetes Type 2, fatty liver, Metabolic Syndrome, Overweight, or Prediabetes. The findings do not quantify its frequency.
Open the Fasting pageAcupuncturepracticeUnclear
Based on 2 studies. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.
A pooled analysis of randomized trials in 2025 reported constipation in studies involving people with Parkinson's Disease. A systematic review from the same year also reported constipation.
Open the Acupuncture pagePilatespracticeUnclear
Based on one study. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.
Constipation was reported in a 2025 RCT with 19 healthy people.
Open the Pilates pageHeating Pads / Warm CompressespracticeUnclear
Based on one study. Strongest study: a small pilot study.
A pilot study involving 10 people reported mild constipation.
Open the Heating Pads / Warm Compresses pageChagasupplementsimple.meter.userReports
Based on one study.
Open the Chaga pageSea Moss (Irish Moss)supplementsimple.meter.userReports
Based on one study.
Open the Sea Moss (Irish Moss) page
The expert view shows every study, dose protocol and source.
What can cause it
Interventions reported to bring this on6 listedHighest probability
- →PracticesFastingCertaintyLowSourceClinical4 other sources
Pooled analyses whose designs were not recorded reported constipation in fasting studies, including analyses involving people with Diabetes Type 2, fatty liver, Metabolic Syndrome, Overweight, or Prediabetes. The findings do not quantify its frequency.
Who was studied
- Healthy people and patients
- Diabetes Type2
- Fatty Liver Nafld
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Overweight
- Prediabetes
Open FastingStudy result
Constipation
- →PracticesAcupunctureCertaintyLowSourceClinical2 other sources
A pooled analysis of randomized trials in 2025 reported constipation in studies involving people with Parkinson's Disease. A systematic review from the same year also reported constipation.
- →PracticesPilatesCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
Constipation was reported in a 2025 RCT with 19 healthy people.
- →PracticesHeating Pads / Warm CompressesCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source
A pilot study involving 10 people reported mild constipation.
Who was studied
- People with a condition
Open Heating Pads / Warm CompressesStudy result
Mild constipation
- →SupplementsChagaCertaintyLowSourceAnecdotal1 other source
This effect was mentioned in 2 of 229 Reddit reports discussing it.
- →SupplementsSea Moss (Irish Moss)CertaintyLowSourceAnecdotal1 other source
This effect was mentioned in 2 of 250 Reddit reports discussing it.
How to read the evidence
Evidence tier — overall strength of the evidence for the whole compound
- StrongWell established — backed by strong, consistent human research.
- ModerateSome genuine support, but mostly from small or lower-quality studies. Promising, not proven.
- PreliminaryEarly-stage evidence — a promising hypothesis, not an established effect yet.
- LimitedVery limited evidence — treat this as a hypothesis, not proof.
- InsufficientNot enough good evidence to draw conclusions yet.
Certainty — how sure we can be that the effect is real
- Very highVery sure — strong, consistent evidence
- HighFairly sure — consistent evidence from good studies
- MediumModerately sure — new studies could change this
- LowNot sure — little or mixed evidence
- Very lowVery unsure — almost no usable evidence
Source — where the data comes from
- Meta-analysisPooled analysis of many trials — the strongest evidence
- RCTRandomized controlled trial — a strong human study design
- ClinicalA human clinical study
- Reference knowledgeFrom general health-science or pharmacology references, not a study of this exact claim
- Animal researchStudied in animals, not humans
- Community reportsAggregated user reports — anecdotal signal, not evidence
- TheoreticalMechanism-based reasoning, not yet tested
Study grade — quality of each underlying study (A best, D weakest)
- AHigh-quality — strong, consistent human trials
- BGood — solid evidence with some limitations
- CModerate — limited, small, or mixed-quality studies
- DWeak — preliminary, indirect, or animal-only
Confidence — how strongly the sources back a finding
A 0–100 score from study quality and agreement
Most supplement evidence is graded C–D. Read it as preliminary signal, not proof.
Full write-up
What is it
Constipation is a health condition and an adverse outcome. Here, it refers to constipation occurring in association with interventions such as Sodium Bicarbonate, Calcium, Vitamin B9 (Folate), or Berberine. It is not an intended benefit; the listed evidence concerns whether these interventions are associated with constipation.
How interventions help
The interventions represented here are associated with causing constipation or other gastrointestinal issues, not with relieving constipation. This means the findings describe possible unwanted changes in bowel function rather than effective approaches for improving the outcome. Because the reported findings differ across interventions, they do not establish one shared mechanism or a general treatment strategy.
The timeframes also vary substantially. Sodium Bicarbonate is represented by an acute single-dose exposure at 0.3 g/kg, whereas the Collagen finding follows 3 months of use. These differences mean the evidence does not define a single onset pattern, and it does not show whether constipation persists after an intervention is stopped. The findings also come from studies in which health status was not specified, so their applicability to particular people or causes of constipation cannot be determined from this information alone.
Choosing guidance
These entries should be read primarily as possible contributors to constipation, not as a set of treatments to choose from. The evidence applies to people whose health status was generally not specified, so it may not predict what will happen in a particular person or explain whether constipation is caused by the supplement, the formulation, or other factors.
Exposure details also limit comparison. Findings from an acute single-dose study should not be assumed to describe prolonged use, while findings from longer studies may not indicate how quickly symptoms appeared. Several entries do not provide a typical dose or duration, making it harder to judge whether the observation applies to a brief trial or continuing use. Human clinical findings are more directly relevant than anecdotal reports or pharmacology references, but study design and population still matter.
One important complication is that Lemon Balm (Melissa) appears in both directions: one clinical study reported improvement, while another reported constipation. This does not establish which experience is more applicable, because the preparations, circumstances, and participants may differ. Dietary Fiber (Prebiotics) also illustrates why an intervention’s intended use should not be confused with its observed associations here. If comparing options, focus on whether the evidence involves humans, whether the exposure resembles the intended use, and whether findings point consistently in one direction rather than relying on a single reported outcome.