Skip to content

health

Constipation

Adverse effect

Constipation is a health condition and an adverse outcome. Here, it refers to constipation occurring in association with interventions such as Sodium Bicarbonate, Calcium, Vitamin B9 (Folate), or Berberine.

A straightforward starting point for understanding constipation and its health context.

These are research findings, not promises. Most options have little evidence, and results differ from person to person.

What can cause it

How likely each one is to cause it, most likely first.

  • FastingpracticeUnclear

    Based on 4 studies. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    Pooled analyses whose designs were not recorded reported constipation in fasting studies, including analyses involving people with Diabetes Type 2, fatty liver, Metabolic Syndrome, Overweight, or Prediabetes. The findings do not quantify its frequency.

    Open the Fasting page
  • AcupuncturepracticeUnclear

    Based on 2 studies. Strongest study: a pooled analysis of several trials.

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials in 2025 reported constipation in studies involving people with Parkinson's Disease. A systematic review from the same year also reported constipation.

    Open the Acupuncture page
  • PilatespracticeUnclear

    Based on one study. Strongest study: a randomized controlled trial.

    Constipation was reported in a 2025 RCT with 19 healthy people.

    Open the Pilates page
  • Heating Pads / Warm CompressespracticeUnclear

    Based on one study. Strongest study: a small pilot study.

    A pilot study involving 10 people reported mild constipation.

    Open the Heating Pads / Warm Compresses page
  • Chagasupplementsimple.meter.userReports

    Based on one study.

    Open the Chaga page
  • Sea Moss (Irish Moss)supplementsimple.meter.userReports

The expert view shows every study, dose protocol and source.

What can cause it

Interventions reported to bring this on6 listed

Highest probability

  1. PracticesFastingCertaintyLowSourceClinical4 other sources

    Pooled analyses whose designs were not recorded reported constipation in fasting studies, including analyses involving people with Diabetes Type 2, fatty liver, Metabolic Syndrome, Overweight, or Prediabetes. The findings do not quantify its frequency.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people and patients
    • Diabetes Type2
    • Fatty Liver Nafld
    • Metabolic Syndrome
    • Overweight
    • Prediabetes

    Study result

    Constipation

    Open Fasting
    →
  2. PracticesAcupunctureCertaintyLowSourceClinical2 other sources

    A pooled analysis of randomized trials in 2025 reported constipation in studies involving people with Parkinson's Disease. A systematic review from the same year also reported constipation.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition
    • Parkinsons Disease

    Study result

    Constipation

    Open Acupuncture
    →
  3. PracticesPilatesCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source

    Constipation was reported in a 2025 RCT with 19 healthy people.

    Who was studied

    • Healthy people

    Study result

    Constipation

    Open Pilates
    →
  4. PracticesHeating Pads / Warm CompressesCertaintyLowSourceClinical1 other source

    A pilot study involving 10 people reported mild constipation.

    Who was studied

    • People with a condition

    Study result

    Mild constipation

    Open Heating Pads / Warm Compresses
    →
  5. SupplementsChagaCertaintyLowSourceAnecdotal1 other source

    This effect was mentioned in 2 of 229 Reddit reports discussing it.

    →
  6. SupplementsSea Moss (Irish Moss)CertaintyLowSourceAnecdotal1 other source

    This effect was mentioned in 2 of 250 Reddit reports discussing it.

    →
How to read the evidence

Evidence tier — overall strength of the evidence for the whole compound

  • StrongWell established — backed by strong, consistent human research.
  • ModerateSome genuine support, but mostly from small or lower-quality studies. Promising, not proven.
  • PreliminaryEarly-stage evidence — a promising hypothesis, not an established effect yet.
  • LimitedVery limited evidence — treat this as a hypothesis, not proof.
  • InsufficientNot enough good evidence to draw conclusions yet.

Certainty — how sure we can be that the effect is real

  • Very highVery sure — strong, consistent evidence
  • HighFairly sure — consistent evidence from good studies
  • MediumModerately sure — new studies could change this
  • LowNot sure — little or mixed evidence
  • Very lowVery unsure — almost no usable evidence

Source — where the data comes from

  • Meta-analysisPooled analysis of many trials — the strongest evidence
  • RCTRandomized controlled trial — a strong human study design
  • ClinicalA human clinical study
  • Reference knowledgeFrom general health-science or pharmacology references, not a study of this exact claim
  • Animal researchStudied in animals, not humans
  • Community reportsAggregated user reports — anecdotal signal, not evidence
  • TheoreticalMechanism-based reasoning, not yet tested

Study grade — quality of each underlying study (A best, D weakest)

  • AHigh-quality — strong, consistent human trials
  • BGood — solid evidence with some limitations
  • CModerate — limited, small, or mixed-quality studies
  • DWeak — preliminary, indirect, or animal-only

Confidence — how strongly the sources back a finding

A 0–100 score from study quality and agreement

Most supplement evidence is graded C–D. Read it as preliminary signal, not proof.

Full write-up

What is it

Constipation is a health condition and an adverse outcome. Here, it refers to constipation occurring in association with interventions such as Sodium Bicarbonate, Calcium, Vitamin B9 (Folate), or Berberine. It is not an intended benefit; the listed evidence concerns whether these interventions are associated with constipation.

How interventions help

The interventions represented here are associated with causing constipation or other gastrointestinal issues, not with relieving constipation. This means the findings describe possible unwanted changes in bowel function rather than effective approaches for improving the outcome. Because the reported findings differ across interventions, they do not establish one shared mechanism or a general treatment strategy.

The timeframes also vary substantially. Sodium Bicarbonate is represented by an acute single-dose exposure at 0.3 g/kg, whereas the Collagen finding follows 3 months of use. These differences mean the evidence does not define a single onset pattern, and it does not show whether constipation persists after an intervention is stopped. The findings also come from studies in which health status was not specified, so their applicability to particular people or causes of constipation cannot be determined from this information alone.

Choosing guidance

These entries should be read primarily as possible contributors to constipation, not as a set of treatments to choose from. The evidence applies to people whose health status was generally not specified, so it may not predict what will happen in a particular person or explain whether constipation is caused by the supplement, the formulation, or other factors.

Exposure details also limit comparison. Findings from an acute single-dose study should not be assumed to describe prolonged use, while findings from longer studies may not indicate how quickly symptoms appeared. Several entries do not provide a typical dose or duration, making it harder to judge whether the observation applies to a brief trial or continuing use. Human clinical findings are more directly relevant than anecdotal reports or pharmacology references, but study design and population still matter.

One important complication is that Lemon Balm (Melissa) appears in both directions: one clinical study reported improvement, while another reported constipation. This does not establish which experience is more applicable, because the preparations, circumstances, and participants may differ. Dietary Fiber (Prebiotics) also illustrates why an intervention’s intended use should not be confused with its observed associations here. If comparing options, focus on whether the evidence involves humans, whether the exposure resembles the intended use, and whether findings point consistently in one direction rather than relying on a single reported outcome.

Diatelos provides general wellness information based on published research. It is not medical advice. Talk to a clinician before starting any new supplement or practice, especially if you have a health condition, are pregnant, or take medication.